Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
The prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of wate...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-04-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154 |
id |
doaj-624f3e03ca4548c59e1a03a47ec528e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-624f3e03ca4548c59e1a03a47ec528e62021-04-10T01:33:20ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402021-04-011110.1177/21582440211008154Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen LivelihoodsYan Wang0Chen Wang1Ruilian Zhang2Junzhuo Xu3North Minzu University, P. R. ChinaNanjing University of Finance and Economics, P. R. ChinaUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, AustraliaHohai University, P. R. ChinaThe prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of water bodies and the livelihoods of fishermen. Using evolutionary game theory and modeling, this article analyzes the complex mutual feedback strategy between local government and the affected fishermen in regard to water body restoration and livelihood security under fishing prohibition. The results show that (a) the performance evaluation mechanism of environmental protection, including rewards and punishments, can provide direct political traction and indirect material guarantees for local governments to perform their duties and allow water body restoration and the transition of fishermen to alternative livelihoods. (b) Whether the local government actively promotes aquaculture closures is restricted by the improvement in the aquatic environment, the aquaculture development under the existing livelihood, and the industrial economic benefits of the new livelihood. And the capacity of them contribute to the overall development of the local government. The development of the net income of both parties in the negotiation will shape the direction of a series of public policies that focus on aquaculture closures.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yan Wang Chen Wang Ruilian Zhang Junzhuo Xu |
spellingShingle |
Yan Wang Chen Wang Ruilian Zhang Junzhuo Xu Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Yan Wang Chen Wang Ruilian Zhang Junzhuo Xu |
author_sort |
Yan Wang |
title |
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods |
title_short |
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods |
title_full |
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods |
title_fullStr |
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods |
title_sort |
trade-off between aquaculture closures and fishermen livelihoods |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of water bodies and the livelihoods of fishermen. Using evolutionary game theory and modeling, this article analyzes the complex mutual feedback strategy between local government and the affected fishermen in regard to water body restoration and livelihood security under fishing prohibition. The results show that (a) the performance evaluation mechanism of environmental protection, including rewards and punishments, can provide direct political traction and indirect material guarantees for local governments to perform their duties and allow water body restoration and the transition of fishermen to alternative livelihoods. (b) Whether the local government actively promotes aquaculture closures is restricted by the improvement in the aquatic environment, the aquaculture development under the existing livelihood, and the industrial economic benefits of the new livelihood. And the capacity of them contribute to the overall development of the local government. The development of the net income of both parties in the negotiation will shape the direction of a series of public policies that focus on aquaculture closures. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanwang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods AT chenwang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods AT ruilianzhang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods AT junzhuoxu tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods |
_version_ |
1721532062245060608 |