Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods

The prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of wate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan Wang, Chen Wang, Ruilian Zhang, Junzhuo Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154
id doaj-624f3e03ca4548c59e1a03a47ec528e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-624f3e03ca4548c59e1a03a47ec528e62021-04-10T01:33:20ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402021-04-011110.1177/21582440211008154Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen LivelihoodsYan Wang0Chen Wang1Ruilian Zhang2Junzhuo Xu3North Minzu University, P. R. ChinaNanjing University of Finance and Economics, P. R. ChinaUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, AustraliaHohai University, P. R. ChinaThe prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of water bodies and the livelihoods of fishermen. Using evolutionary game theory and modeling, this article analyzes the complex mutual feedback strategy between local government and the affected fishermen in regard to water body restoration and livelihood security under fishing prohibition. The results show that (a) the performance evaluation mechanism of environmental protection, including rewards and punishments, can provide direct political traction and indirect material guarantees for local governments to perform their duties and allow water body restoration and the transition of fishermen to alternative livelihoods. (b) Whether the local government actively promotes aquaculture closures is restricted by the improvement in the aquatic environment, the aquaculture development under the existing livelihood, and the industrial economic benefits of the new livelihood. And the capacity of them contribute to the overall development of the local government. The development of the net income of both parties in the negotiation will shape the direction of a series of public policies that focus on aquaculture closures.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yan Wang
Chen Wang
Ruilian Zhang
Junzhuo Xu
spellingShingle Yan Wang
Chen Wang
Ruilian Zhang
Junzhuo Xu
Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
SAGE Open
author_facet Yan Wang
Chen Wang
Ruilian Zhang
Junzhuo Xu
author_sort Yan Wang
title Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
title_short Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
title_full Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
title_fullStr Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
title_full_unstemmed Trade-Off Between Aquaculture Closures and Fishermen Livelihoods
title_sort trade-off between aquaculture closures and fishermen livelihoods
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The prohibition of aquaculture is an important policy instrument for water quality protection. However, there are lack of observations on the complex interactions between stakeholders in the limiting or closing of fisheries and the internal cooperative mechanism that balances the restoration of water bodies and the livelihoods of fishermen. Using evolutionary game theory and modeling, this article analyzes the complex mutual feedback strategy between local government and the affected fishermen in regard to water body restoration and livelihood security under fishing prohibition. The results show that (a) the performance evaluation mechanism of environmental protection, including rewards and punishments, can provide direct political traction and indirect material guarantees for local governments to perform their duties and allow water body restoration and the transition of fishermen to alternative livelihoods. (b) Whether the local government actively promotes aquaculture closures is restricted by the improvement in the aquatic environment, the aquaculture development under the existing livelihood, and the industrial economic benefits of the new livelihood. And the capacity of them contribute to the overall development of the local government. The development of the net income of both parties in the negotiation will shape the direction of a series of public policies that focus on aquaculture closures.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008154
work_keys_str_mv AT yanwang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods
AT chenwang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods
AT ruilianzhang tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods
AT junzhuoxu tradeoffbetweenaquacultureclosuresandfishermenlivelihoods
_version_ 1721532062245060608