The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children

purpose: To compare the sedation effects of two intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children. Method: 40 children for MRI were randomly divided into two groups, namely 20 cases for each group: nasal drip group(group A)and nasal spray group(group B). Group A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qi Shuang, Wu Suming, Liang Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801043
id doaj-62424385bda1468ab5cf509254414534
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62424385bda1468ab5cf5092544145342021-04-02T19:37:49ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582017-01-0180104310.1051/bioconf/20170801043bioconf_icmsb2017_01043The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in childrenQi Shuang0Wu Suming1Liang Feng2China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin UniversityThe 4th Hospital of Jilin University(The General Hospital of FAW)China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin Universitypurpose: To compare the sedation effects of two intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children. Method: 40 children for MRI were randomly divided into two groups, namely 20 cases for each group: nasal drip group(group A)and nasal spray group(group B). Group A and group B received intranasal dexmedetomidine of 1.5 ug/kg by two methods. Monitoring the HR, SpO2, RR and inspection time of the two groups so as to observe the sedation effects and Ramsay sedation score while recording the adverse reactions. Results: There was no significant difference in the HR, SpO2, RR between the two groups at the same time point (P>0.05). Compared with group A, the time-to-fall-asleep in group B was shorter and the adverse reactions significantly decreased (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with nasal drip, nasal spray dexmedetomidine by MAD can shorten the time-to-fall-asleep and reduce adverse reactions for MRI in children.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801043
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qi Shuang
Wu Suming
Liang Feng
spellingShingle Qi Shuang
Wu Suming
Liang Feng
The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
BIO Web of Conferences
author_facet Qi Shuang
Wu Suming
Liang Feng
author_sort Qi Shuang
title The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
title_short The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
title_full The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
title_fullStr The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
title_full_unstemmed The observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
title_sort observation of the sedation effects of intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging in children
publisher EDP Sciences
series BIO Web of Conferences
issn 2117-4458
publishDate 2017-01-01
description purpose: To compare the sedation effects of two intranasal methods of dexmedetomidine for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children. Method: 40 children for MRI were randomly divided into two groups, namely 20 cases for each group: nasal drip group(group A)and nasal spray group(group B). Group A and group B received intranasal dexmedetomidine of 1.5 ug/kg by two methods. Monitoring the HR, SpO2, RR and inspection time of the two groups so as to observe the sedation effects and Ramsay sedation score while recording the adverse reactions. Results: There was no significant difference in the HR, SpO2, RR between the two groups at the same time point (P>0.05). Compared with group A, the time-to-fall-asleep in group B was shorter and the adverse reactions significantly decreased (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with nasal drip, nasal spray dexmedetomidine by MAD can shorten the time-to-fall-asleep and reduce adverse reactions for MRI in children.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801043
work_keys_str_mv AT qishuang theobservationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
AT wusuming theobservationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
AT liangfeng theobservationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
AT qishuang observationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
AT wusuming observationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
AT liangfeng observationofthesedationeffectsofintranasalmethodsofdexmedetomidineformagneticresonanceimaginginchildren
_version_ 1721548592910434304