Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”
These debate articles show the arguments “pro” and “con” ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV. They illuminate the weak evidence for either recommendation, due to a lack of large randomized trials (RTCs).
Main Authors: | Barbara JM. Mulder, Mikael Dellborg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-05-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668521000550 |
Similar Items
-
ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV? A cautious attitude is justified
by: Barbara J.M. Mulder, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
ICD implantation for primary prevention in adult patients with a systemic right ventricle – The case in favor of implanting
by: Mikael Dellborg, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Transcription factors Rv0081 and Rv3334 connect the early and the enduring hypoxic response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
by: Xian Sun, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Persistence of ICD indication at the time of replacement in patients with initial implant for primary prevention indication: Effect on subsequent ICD therapies
by: Gabriele Dell’Era, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Periprocedural Considerations During Implantation of ICD In A Patient With Dextrocardia
by: Farid Aliyev, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)