Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effects of several different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsA total of 400 patients who received cholecystectomy in our hospital from January 2013 to September 2014 were divided into four groups according to the approaches to laparoscopy (n=100 pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HE Chengping
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2014-12-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6184&ClassID=1124123332
id doaj-623b8fd257794b25b3f7a3fc34f53a4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-623b8fd257794b25b3f7a3fc34f53a4c2020-11-24T23:09:53ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562014-12-0130121292129410.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.12.014 Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy HE Chengping0Department of General Surgery, Beijing Changping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102200, ChinaObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effects of several different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsA total of 400 patients who received cholecystectomy in our hospital from January 2013 to September 2014 were divided into four groups according to the approaches to laparoscopy (n=100 per group): single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All clinical data were systematically analyzed on six indicators: blood loss during surgery (ml), operation time (min), time to ambulation after surgery (h), time to taking meal after surgery (h), length of hospital stay after surgery (d), and the degree of pain at 6 h after surgery (rating of pain scale). The clinical effects of the different approaches were compared between the four groups. ResultsSignificant differences were observed in the following indicators: the degree of pain at 6 h after surgery between the groups of single-port and two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.036); operation time between the groups of single-port and three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.028); length of hospital stay between the groups of single-port and three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.042). All other indicators showed no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). Statistical analysis of the six indicators indicated that all four approaches did not significantly influence the incidence of surgical complications (P>0.05). ConclusionAll the four approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are safe and feasible, but the operation techniques should be standardized, anatomical knowledge should be mastered, and any changes in the surgical situation should be strictly monitored. Before the surgery, the patients′ wishes and their physical conditions should be considered to choose the appropriate surgical approach and improve the surgical safety. http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6184&ClassID=1124123332cholelithiasis; cholecystectomylaparoscopic; clinical effects
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author HE Chengping
spellingShingle HE Chengping
Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
cholelithiasis; cholecystectomy
laparoscopic; clinical effects
author_facet HE Chengping
author_sort HE Chengping
title Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort clinical effects of different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2014-12-01
description ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effects of several different approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsA total of 400 patients who received cholecystectomy in our hospital from January 2013 to September 2014 were divided into four groups according to the approaches to laparoscopy (n=100 per group): single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All clinical data were systematically analyzed on six indicators: blood loss during surgery (ml), operation time (min), time to ambulation after surgery (h), time to taking meal after surgery (h), length of hospital stay after surgery (d), and the degree of pain at 6 h after surgery (rating of pain scale). The clinical effects of the different approaches were compared between the four groups. ResultsSignificant differences were observed in the following indicators: the degree of pain at 6 h after surgery between the groups of single-port and two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.036); operation time between the groups of single-port and three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.028); length of hospital stay between the groups of single-port and three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P=0.042). All other indicators showed no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). Statistical analysis of the six indicators indicated that all four approaches did not significantly influence the incidence of surgical complications (P>0.05). ConclusionAll the four approaches to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are safe and feasible, but the operation techniques should be standardized, anatomical knowledge should be mastered, and any changes in the surgical situation should be strictly monitored. Before the surgery, the patients′ wishes and their physical conditions should be considered to choose the appropriate surgical approach and improve the surgical safety.
topic cholelithiasis; cholecystectomy
laparoscopic; clinical effects
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6184&ClassID=1124123332
work_keys_str_mv AT hechengping clinicaleffectsofdifferentapproachestolaparoscopiccholecystectomy
_version_ 1725609215207145472