Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse

Objective: This study was conducted to assess pharmacists’ practices when counseling patients on their prescription medications, and their preferences for training. Methods: Five focus group discussions of community pharmacists (n=45, with seven to eleven participants in each group) were conducte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Douglas Thornton, Precious Anyanwu, Vaishnavi Tata, Tamara Al Rawwad, Marc L. Fleming
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020-03-01
Series:Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1682
id doaj-62316ae163244490989c12413bd3970e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62316ae163244490989c12413bd3970e2020-11-25T02:59:27ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552020-03-01181168210.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1682 Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse J. Douglas Thornton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6017-7500Precious Anyanwu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-6241Vaishnavi Tata https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-9743Tamara Al Rawwad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1394-4575Marc L. Fleming https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-7988Objective: This study was conducted to assess pharmacists’ practices when counseling patients on their prescription medications, and their preferences for training. Methods: Five focus group discussions of community pharmacists (n=45, with seven to eleven participants in each group) were conducted in a major metropolitan city in the southern United States. Participants were recruited via email using a list of community pharmacists provided by the Texas State Board of Pharmacy. All focus group discussions were structured using a moderator guide consisting of both discrete and open-ended questions. Qualitative analysis software was used to analyze the data with a thematic analysis approach. Results: The participants in this study had a high self-efficacy regarding their ability to counsel on both new and opioid prescriptions. Many pharmacists experienced the same barriers to counseling and agreed on the components of counseling. However, the themes that emerged showed that the participants exhibited only a partial understanding of the components of counseling. The themes that emerged in the thematic analysis were perceived confidence and discordant counseling practices, inadequate infrastructure, lack of comprehensive counseling, inconsistent use of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), and pharmacists’ desired training/assistance. Conclusions: Community pharmacists are in a unique position to help combat the opioid crisis; however, there has been very little research on the pharmacist-patient interaction in this context. With policy changes, such as the PDMP mandate, going into effect across the country, it is important to capitalize on the potential community pharmacists have in ameliorating the opioid crisis in the United States.https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1682counselingprescription drug misuseprofessional practicepharmaciespharmacistsprescription drug monitoring programsopioid epidemicfocus groupstexas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Douglas Thornton
Precious Anyanwu
Vaishnavi Tata
Tamara Al Rawwad
Marc L. Fleming
spellingShingle J. Douglas Thornton
Precious Anyanwu
Vaishnavi Tata
Tamara Al Rawwad
Marc L. Fleming
Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
Pharmacy Practice
counseling
prescription drug misuse
professional practice
pharmacies
pharmacists
prescription drug monitoring programs
opioid epidemic
focus groups
texas
author_facet J. Douglas Thornton
Precious Anyanwu
Vaishnavi Tata
Tamara Al Rawwad
Marc L. Fleming
author_sort J. Douglas Thornton
title Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
title_short Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
title_full Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
title_fullStr Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
title_full_unstemmed Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
title_sort differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
series Pharmacy Practice
issn 1885-642X
1886-3655
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Objective: This study was conducted to assess pharmacists’ practices when counseling patients on their prescription medications, and their preferences for training. Methods: Five focus group discussions of community pharmacists (n=45, with seven to eleven participants in each group) were conducted in a major metropolitan city in the southern United States. Participants were recruited via email using a list of community pharmacists provided by the Texas State Board of Pharmacy. All focus group discussions were structured using a moderator guide consisting of both discrete and open-ended questions. Qualitative analysis software was used to analyze the data with a thematic analysis approach. Results: The participants in this study had a high self-efficacy regarding their ability to counsel on both new and opioid prescriptions. Many pharmacists experienced the same barriers to counseling and agreed on the components of counseling. However, the themes that emerged showed that the participants exhibited only a partial understanding of the components of counseling. The themes that emerged in the thematic analysis were perceived confidence and discordant counseling practices, inadequate infrastructure, lack of comprehensive counseling, inconsistent use of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), and pharmacists’ desired training/assistance. Conclusions: Community pharmacists are in a unique position to help combat the opioid crisis; however, there has been very little research on the pharmacist-patient interaction in this context. With policy changes, such as the PDMP mandate, going into effect across the country, it is important to capitalize on the potential community pharmacists have in ameliorating the opioid crisis in the United States.
topic counseling
prescription drug misuse
professional practice
pharmacies
pharmacists
prescription drug monitoring programs
opioid epidemic
focus groups
texas
url https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1682
work_keys_str_mv AT jdouglasthornton differencesbetweenpharmacistsperceptionofcounselingandpracticeintheeraofprescriptiondrugmisuse
AT preciousanyanwu differencesbetweenpharmacistsperceptionofcounselingandpracticeintheeraofprescriptiondrugmisuse
AT vaishnavitata differencesbetweenpharmacistsperceptionofcounselingandpracticeintheeraofprescriptiondrugmisuse
AT tamaraalrawwad differencesbetweenpharmacistsperceptionofcounselingandpracticeintheeraofprescriptiondrugmisuse
AT marclfleming differencesbetweenpharmacistsperceptionofcounselingandpracticeintheeraofprescriptiondrugmisuse
_version_ 1724702322221645824