Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.

Across a broad spectrum of memory tasks, retention is superior following a night of sleep compared to a day of wake. However, this result alone does not clarify whether sleep merely slows the forgetting that would otherwise occur as a result of information processing during wakefulness, or whether s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrie Bailes, Mary Caldwell, Erin J Wamsley, Matthew A Tucker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220419
id doaj-622b7f387f314bc488698c2230844aed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-622b7f387f314bc488698c2230844aed2021-03-04T11:19:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022041910.1371/journal.pone.0220419Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.Carrie BailesMary CaldwellErin J WamsleyMatthew A TuckerAcross a broad spectrum of memory tasks, retention is superior following a night of sleep compared to a day of wake. However, this result alone does not clarify whether sleep merely slows the forgetting that would otherwise occur as a result of information processing during wakefulness, or whether sleep actually consolidates memories, protecting them from subsequent retroactive interference. Two influential studies suggested that sleep protects memories against the subsequent retroactive interference that occurs when participants learn new yet overlapping information (interference learning). In these studies, interference learning was much less detrimental to memory following a night of sleep compared to a day of wakefulness, an indication that sleep supports this important aspect of memory consolidation. In the current replication study, we repeated the protocol of and, additionally, we examined the impact of intrinsic motivation on performance in sleep and wake participants. We were unable to replicate the finding that sleep protects memories against retroactive interference, with the detrimental effects of interference learning being essentially the same in wake and sleep participants. We also found that while intrinsic motivation benefitted task acquisition it was not a modulator of sleep-wake differences in memory processing. Although we cannot accept the null hypothesis that sleep has no role to play in reducing the negative impact of interference, the findings draw into question prior evidence for sleep's role in protecting memories against interference. Moreover, the current study highlights the importance of replicating key findings in the study of sleep's impact on memory processing before drawing strong conclusions that set the direction of future research.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220419
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carrie Bailes
Mary Caldwell
Erin J Wamsley
Matthew A Tucker
spellingShingle Carrie Bailes
Mary Caldwell
Erin J Wamsley
Matthew A Tucker
Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Carrie Bailes
Mary Caldwell
Erin J Wamsley
Matthew A Tucker
author_sort Carrie Bailes
title Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
title_short Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
title_full Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
title_fullStr Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
title_full_unstemmed Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.
title_sort does sleep protect memories against interference? a failure to replicate.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Across a broad spectrum of memory tasks, retention is superior following a night of sleep compared to a day of wake. However, this result alone does not clarify whether sleep merely slows the forgetting that would otherwise occur as a result of information processing during wakefulness, or whether sleep actually consolidates memories, protecting them from subsequent retroactive interference. Two influential studies suggested that sleep protects memories against the subsequent retroactive interference that occurs when participants learn new yet overlapping information (interference learning). In these studies, interference learning was much less detrimental to memory following a night of sleep compared to a day of wakefulness, an indication that sleep supports this important aspect of memory consolidation. In the current replication study, we repeated the protocol of and, additionally, we examined the impact of intrinsic motivation on performance in sleep and wake participants. We were unable to replicate the finding that sleep protects memories against retroactive interference, with the detrimental effects of interference learning being essentially the same in wake and sleep participants. We also found that while intrinsic motivation benefitted task acquisition it was not a modulator of sleep-wake differences in memory processing. Although we cannot accept the null hypothesis that sleep has no role to play in reducing the negative impact of interference, the findings draw into question prior evidence for sleep's role in protecting memories against interference. Moreover, the current study highlights the importance of replicating key findings in the study of sleep's impact on memory processing before drawing strong conclusions that set the direction of future research.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220419
work_keys_str_mv AT carriebailes doessleepprotectmemoriesagainstinterferenceafailuretoreplicate
AT marycaldwell doessleepprotectmemoriesagainstinterferenceafailuretoreplicate
AT erinjwamsley doessleepprotectmemoriesagainstinterferenceafailuretoreplicate
AT matthewatucker doessleepprotectmemoriesagainstinterferenceafailuretoreplicate
_version_ 1714803915967430656