Judicial Individualization of Punishment in Special Situations. Judge's Role in these Cases
Punishment cannot fully implement its mission and cannot achieve its purpose unless it is perfectly molded to concrete individual case. To this end, the penalty should be appropriate to the degree of social danger of the crime and its perpetrator, and, equally, to be given by taking in considerati...
Main Author: | Cosmin Peneoașu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Danubius University
2015-05-01
|
Series: | EIRP Proceedings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1673/1543 |
Similar Items
-
147 Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances. Their Impact on Judicial Individualization of Punishment
by: Cosmin Peonaşu
Published: (2015-08-01) -
CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF PERSONALIZING THE PENALTIES
by: ION RISTEA
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Functions of the checks and balances of the investigative judge in a criminal trial
by: Alimkulov E.T.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Judges' Considerations in Sentencing a Prison Under Special Minimum Criminal Threats in the Solok District Court (Case Study of Decision Number 40 / Pid.Sus / 2014 / Pn. Slk)
by: Okta Zulfitri, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Authorization content custody – as one of the main activities of the investigating judge
by: Alimkulov E.T.
Published: (2016-03-01)