Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor
Invisible labor is a term used by labor economists to describe work that contributes, and is often even necessary, to the economy but largely goes unrecognized and unpaid. Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the sea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Medical Library Association |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1226 |
id |
doaj-62128c4b65e44071b0fd11b101a84267 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62128c4b65e44071b0fd11b101a842672021-10-05T18:40:20ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of the Medical Library Association1536-50501558-94392021-10-01109310.5195/jmla.2021.1226603Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible laborAmanda Ross-White0Queen's UniversityInvisible labor is a term used by labor economists to describe work that contributes, and is often even necessary, to the economy but largely goes unrecognized and unpaid. Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the search process can be considered a form of invisible labor because it often goes without recognition. This occurs sometimes through not granting authorship to the librarian who performed the intellectual contribution of search development and sometimes through a devaluing of the search process by the choice of language used to describe the search. By using the term search as a passive verb or noun, authors devalue the real intellectual labor involved in searching, which includes decisions related to search terms and combinations, database selection, and other search parameters. This commentary explores the context of how searching is described through the concept of invisible labor.http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1226authorshiplibrariansinformation storage and retrievalsystematic reviews as topicfeminismwork |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amanda Ross-White |
spellingShingle |
Amanda Ross-White Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor Journal of the Medical Library Association authorship librarians information storage and retrieval systematic reviews as topic feminism work |
author_facet |
Amanda Ross-White |
author_sort |
Amanda Ross-White |
title |
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
title_short |
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
title_full |
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
title_fullStr |
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
title_sort |
search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Journal of the Medical Library Association |
issn |
1536-5050 1558-9439 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
Invisible labor is a term used by labor economists to describe work that contributes, and is often even necessary, to the economy but largely goes unrecognized and unpaid. Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the search process can be considered a form of invisible labor because it often goes without recognition. This occurs sometimes through not granting authorship to the librarian who performed the intellectual contribution of search development and sometimes through a devaluing of the search process by the choice of language used to describe the search. By using the term search as a passive verb or noun, authors devalue the real intellectual labor involved in searching, which includes decisions related to search terms and combinations, database selection, and other search parameters. This commentary explores the context of how searching is described through the concept of invisible labor. |
topic |
authorship librarians information storage and retrieval systematic reviews as topic feminism work |
url |
http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1226 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandarosswhite searchisaverbsystematicreviewsearchingasinvisiblelabor |
_version_ |
1716841688013471744 |