Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations

Between 2015 and 2016, the Netherlands experienced an asylum crisis, one that directly affected organizations working with refugee reception and integration. Besides civil society and governmental organizations (CSOs and GOs), the period also saw individuals coming together to form emergent CSOs (EC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Larruina, Kees Boersma, Elena Ponzoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-06-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1954
id doaj-620a25d785334da0802f8086b43ce669
record_format Article
spelling doaj-620a25d785334da0802f8086b43ce6692020-11-25T00:25:39ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032019-06-0172536310.17645/si.v7i2.19541043Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental OrganizationsRobert Larruina0Kees Boersma1Elena Ponzoni2Department of Organization Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Organization Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The NetherlandsBetween 2015 and 2016, the Netherlands experienced an asylum crisis, one that directly affected organizations working with refugee reception and integration. Besides civil society and governmental organizations (CSOs and GOs), the period also saw individuals coming together to form emergent CSOs (ECSOs). We look at these organizations to determine whether their work brought a shift in Dutch practice and policy with regarding refugee reception. We also examine literature concerning crisis governance, participatory spaces, and refugee reception governance. Finally, we investigate the views and experiences of individuals from selected organizations that played an active role during the crisis. This explorative research is based upon a qualitative and interpretative study involving panel discussions, document analysis, and interviews, conducted between 2017 and 2018 by the Refugee Academy at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. We show circumstantial and interorganizational elements that enhanced and hampered interactions between ECSOs, CSOs, and GOs. We argue that shared activities during the crisis may have created possibilities for durable forms of collaboration and for the inclusion of civil society groups in a debate mostly dominated by GOs.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1954asylum crisiscivil society organizationscollaborationcrisis governancegovernmental organizationsparticipationrefugee reception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Larruina
Kees Boersma
Elena Ponzoni
spellingShingle Robert Larruina
Kees Boersma
Elena Ponzoni
Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
Social Inclusion
asylum crisis
civil society organizations
collaboration
crisis governance
governmental organizations
participation
refugee reception
author_facet Robert Larruina
Kees Boersma
Elena Ponzoni
author_sort Robert Larruina
title Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
title_short Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
title_full Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
title_fullStr Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations
title_sort responding to the dutch asylum crisis: implications for collaborative work between civil society and governmental organizations
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Between 2015 and 2016, the Netherlands experienced an asylum crisis, one that directly affected organizations working with refugee reception and integration. Besides civil society and governmental organizations (CSOs and GOs), the period also saw individuals coming together to form emergent CSOs (ECSOs). We look at these organizations to determine whether their work brought a shift in Dutch practice and policy with regarding refugee reception. We also examine literature concerning crisis governance, participatory spaces, and refugee reception governance. Finally, we investigate the views and experiences of individuals from selected organizations that played an active role during the crisis. This explorative research is based upon a qualitative and interpretative study involving panel discussions, document analysis, and interviews, conducted between 2017 and 2018 by the Refugee Academy at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. We show circumstantial and interorganizational elements that enhanced and hampered interactions between ECSOs, CSOs, and GOs. We argue that shared activities during the crisis may have created possibilities for durable forms of collaboration and for the inclusion of civil society groups in a debate mostly dominated by GOs.
topic asylum crisis
civil society organizations
collaboration
crisis governance
governmental organizations
participation
refugee reception
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1954
work_keys_str_mv AT robertlarruina respondingtothedutchasylumcrisisimplicationsforcollaborativeworkbetweencivilsocietyandgovernmentalorganizations
AT keesboersma respondingtothedutchasylumcrisisimplicationsforcollaborativeworkbetweencivilsocietyandgovernmentalorganizations
AT elenaponzoni respondingtothedutchasylumcrisisimplicationsforcollaborativeworkbetweencivilsocietyandgovernmentalorganizations
_version_ 1725347643504197632