Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications

Background: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy, Susitha Thankian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of the Scientific Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=Santhanakumarasamy
id doaj-6209c0dfaf2745c399cc901245c670d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6209c0dfaf2745c399cc901245c670d72020-11-24T22:47:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Scientific Society0974-50092015-01-0142316616910.4103/0974-5009.165553Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implicationsPoongodi Lakshmi SanthanakumarasamySusitha ThankianBackground: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and evaluation of different methods (cefoxitin disc diffusion [DD] method, Chrom agar and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in the detection of MRSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 S. aureus isolates from pus samples were identified by standard biochemical techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by Kirby Bauer′s DD method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. D test was done to detect clindamycin resistance. Methicillin resistance was evaluated by cefoxitin DD method, Chrom agar (HiCrome MeReSa agar base and selective supplement) and reverse transcription-PCR. Result: Out of 100 S. aureus isolates, 34% were detected as MRSA by cefoxitin DD method. All these isolates were detected by Chrom agar within 24 h. Additional isolates were not detected even after 48 h of incubation. mecA gene was detected by PCR in all these 34 MRSA isolates. Conclusion: The early detection of MRSA is of prime importance in the prognosis of staphylococcal infections. An integrated awareness program, good hand wash technique, epidemiological studies and effective control measures are the goals for elimination of MRSA in hospitals.http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=SanthanakumarasamyCefoxitin disc diffusionChrom agarD testmecA genemethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy
Susitha Thankian
spellingShingle Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy
Susitha Thankian
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
Journal of the Scientific Society
Cefoxitin disc diffusion
Chrom agar
D test
mecA gene
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
author_facet Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy
Susitha Thankian
author_sort Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy
title Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
title_short Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
title_full Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
title_fullStr Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
title_sort comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus and its implications
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of the Scientific Society
issn 0974-5009
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and evaluation of different methods (cefoxitin disc diffusion [DD] method, Chrom agar and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in the detection of MRSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 S. aureus isolates from pus samples were identified by standard biochemical techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by Kirby Bauer′s DD method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. D test was done to detect clindamycin resistance. Methicillin resistance was evaluated by cefoxitin DD method, Chrom agar (HiCrome MeReSa agar base and selective supplement) and reverse transcription-PCR. Result: Out of 100 S. aureus isolates, 34% were detected as MRSA by cefoxitin DD method. All these isolates were detected by Chrom agar within 24 h. Additional isolates were not detected even after 48 h of incubation. mecA gene was detected by PCR in all these 34 MRSA isolates. Conclusion: The early detection of MRSA is of prime importance in the prognosis of staphylococcal infections. An integrated awareness program, good hand wash technique, epidemiological studies and effective control measures are the goals for elimination of MRSA in hospitals.
topic Cefoxitin disc diffusion
Chrom agar
D test
mecA gene
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
url http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=Santhanakumarasamy
work_keys_str_mv AT poongodilakshmisanthanakumarasamy comparisonofphenotypicandmolecularmethodsinthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusanditsimplications
AT susithathankian comparisonofphenotypicandmolecularmethodsinthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusanditsimplications
_version_ 1725682600096301056