Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications
Background: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Scientific Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=Santhanakumarasamy |
id |
doaj-6209c0dfaf2745c399cc901245c670d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6209c0dfaf2745c399cc901245c670d72020-11-24T22:47:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Scientific Society0974-50092015-01-0142316616910.4103/0974-5009.165553Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implicationsPoongodi Lakshmi SanthanakumarasamySusitha ThankianBackground: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and evaluation of different methods (cefoxitin disc diffusion [DD] method, Chrom agar and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in the detection of MRSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 S. aureus isolates from pus samples were identified by standard biochemical techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by Kirby Bauer′s DD method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. D test was done to detect clindamycin resistance. Methicillin resistance was evaluated by cefoxitin DD method, Chrom agar (HiCrome MeReSa agar base and selective supplement) and reverse transcription-PCR. Result: Out of 100 S. aureus isolates, 34% were detected as MRSA by cefoxitin DD method. All these isolates were detected by Chrom agar within 24 h. Additional isolates were not detected even after 48 h of incubation. mecA gene was detected by PCR in all these 34 MRSA isolates. Conclusion: The early detection of MRSA is of prime importance in the prognosis of staphylococcal infections. An integrated awareness program, good hand wash technique, epidemiological studies and effective control measures are the goals for elimination of MRSA in hospitals.http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=SanthanakumarasamyCefoxitin disc diffusionChrom agarD testmecA genemethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy Susitha Thankian |
spellingShingle |
Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy Susitha Thankian Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications Journal of the Scientific Society Cefoxitin disc diffusion Chrom agar D test mecA gene methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
author_facet |
Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy Susitha Thankian |
author_sort |
Poongodi Lakshmi Santhanakumarasamy |
title |
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
title_short |
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
title_full |
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
title_sort |
comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods in the detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus and its implications |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of the Scientific Society |
issn |
0974-5009 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Background: Globally, Staphylococcus aureus is considered the most common cause of nosocomial infections. In recent times, there is a steady rise in the number of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. Aim: This study was done to find out the prevalence, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and evaluation of different methods (cefoxitin disc diffusion [DD] method, Chrom agar and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in the detection of MRSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 S. aureus isolates from pus samples were identified by standard biochemical techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by Kirby Bauer′s DD method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. D test was done to detect clindamycin resistance. Methicillin resistance was evaluated by cefoxitin DD method, Chrom agar (HiCrome MeReSa agar base and selective supplement) and reverse transcription-PCR. Result: Out of 100 S. aureus isolates, 34% were detected as MRSA by cefoxitin DD method. All these isolates were detected by Chrom agar within 24 h. Additional isolates were not detected even after 48 h of incubation. mecA gene was detected by PCR in all these 34 MRSA isolates. Conclusion: The early detection of MRSA is of prime importance in the prognosis of staphylococcal infections. An integrated awareness program, good hand wash technique, epidemiological studies and effective control measures are the goals for elimination of MRSA in hospitals. |
topic |
Cefoxitin disc diffusion Chrom agar D test mecA gene methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
url |
http://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2015;volume=42;issue=3;spage=166;epage=169;aulast=Santhanakumarasamy |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT poongodilakshmisanthanakumarasamy comparisonofphenotypicandmolecularmethodsinthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusanditsimplications AT susithathankian comparisonofphenotypicandmolecularmethodsinthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusanditsimplications |
_version_ |
1725682600096301056 |