Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be expla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wirsel Stefan GR, Mendgen Kurt W, Neubert Karin, Ernst Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-10-01
Series:BMC Microbiology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/11/242
id doaj-6206d6cc714d4393a02c5549e9df3e68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6206d6cc714d4393a02c5549e9df3e682020-11-24T23:28:20ZengBMCBMC Microbiology1471-21802011-10-0111124210.1186/1471-2180-11-242Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reedWirsel Stefan GRMendgen Kurt WNeubert KarinErnst Michael<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, <it>Microdochium bolleyi </it>and <it>M. phragmitis</it>, colonizing <it>Phragmites australis</it>, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi. From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. <it>M. bolleyi </it>preferred dry habitats, whereas <it>M. phragmitis </it>prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize <it>P. australis </it>at the same locations, indicated spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/11/242
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wirsel Stefan GR
Mendgen Kurt W
Neubert Karin
Ernst Michael
spellingShingle Wirsel Stefan GR
Mendgen Kurt W
Neubert Karin
Ernst Michael
Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
BMC Microbiology
author_facet Wirsel Stefan GR
Mendgen Kurt W
Neubert Karin
Ernst Michael
author_sort Wirsel Stefan GR
title Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
title_short Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
title_full Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
title_fullStr Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
title_full_unstemmed Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>Microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
title_sort niche differentiation of two sympatric species of <it>microdochium </it>colonizing the roots of common reed
publisher BMC
series BMC Microbiology
issn 1471-2180
publishDate 2011-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, <it>Microdochium bolleyi </it>and <it>M. phragmitis</it>, colonizing <it>Phragmites australis</it>, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi. From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. <it>M. bolleyi </it>preferred dry habitats, whereas <it>M. phragmitis </it>prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize <it>P. australis </it>at the same locations, indicated spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/11/242
work_keys_str_mv AT wirselstefangr nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofitmicrodochiumitcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT mendgenkurtw nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofitmicrodochiumitcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT neubertkarin nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofitmicrodochiumitcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
AT ernstmichael nichedifferentiationoftwosympatricspeciesofitmicrodochiumitcolonizingtherootsofcommonreed
_version_ 1725549691664334848