The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances

In administering governance, Regional Heads are given an authority to manage the local finances independently. This authority is regulated in Law Number 9 of 2015 and Government Regulation Number 3 of 2007. Accountability of Regional Heads is a form of a democratic government. In a democratic govern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sintara Dani, Nasution Faisal Akbar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200009
id doaj-61fb541cbba748429abb789fafd2eca1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61fb541cbba748429abb789fafd2eca12021-04-02T14:50:01ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01520000910.1051/e3sconf/20185200009e3sconf_nrm2018_00009The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional financesSintara DaniNasution Faisal AkbarIn administering governance, Regional Heads are given an authority to manage the local finances independently. This authority is regulated in Law Number 9 of 2015 and Government Regulation Number 3 of 2007. Accountability of Regional Heads is a form of a democratic government. In a democratic government, the government has limited power and is not justified to act arbitrarily against its citizens. In reality, the implementation of the accountability is often the result of a political compromise. Political compromises occur due to the behavior of the political elite and the weakness of the existing legislation. This weakness relates to the mechanism of the accountability against the management of regional finances which opens an opportunity between the Regional Heads and the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) to conduct a negative relationship. The political compromises in the accountability of the Regional Heads have had a negative impact on the local governance. Whereas, the purpose of implementing a regional autonomy is to improve the quality of justice, democracy and prosperity. Therefore, before the DPRD rejects the accountability of the Regional Heads, it must first be tested in the Supreme Court.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200009
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sintara Dani
Nasution Faisal Akbar
spellingShingle Sintara Dani
Nasution Faisal Akbar
The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Sintara Dani
Nasution Faisal Akbar
author_sort Sintara Dani
title The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
title_short The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
title_full The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
title_fullStr The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
title_full_unstemmed The responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
title_sort responsibility of the regional heads against the management of regional finances
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In administering governance, Regional Heads are given an authority to manage the local finances independently. This authority is regulated in Law Number 9 of 2015 and Government Regulation Number 3 of 2007. Accountability of Regional Heads is a form of a democratic government. In a democratic government, the government has limited power and is not justified to act arbitrarily against its citizens. In reality, the implementation of the accountability is often the result of a political compromise. Political compromises occur due to the behavior of the political elite and the weakness of the existing legislation. This weakness relates to the mechanism of the accountability against the management of regional finances which opens an opportunity between the Regional Heads and the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) to conduct a negative relationship. The political compromises in the accountability of the Regional Heads have had a negative impact on the local governance. Whereas, the purpose of implementing a regional autonomy is to improve the quality of justice, democracy and prosperity. Therefore, before the DPRD rejects the accountability of the Regional Heads, it must first be tested in the Supreme Court.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200009
work_keys_str_mv AT sintaradani theresponsibilityoftheregionalheadsagainstthemanagementofregionalfinances
AT nasutionfaisalakbar theresponsibilityoftheregionalheadsagainstthemanagementofregionalfinances
AT sintaradani responsibilityoftheregionalheadsagainstthemanagementofregionalfinances
AT nasutionfaisalakbar responsibilityoftheregionalheadsagainstthemanagementofregionalfinances
_version_ 1721561172055949312