Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic condition usually without cure. Significant developments, particularly those addressing pathophysiology, mainly started at the bench. This approach has seen many clinical observations initially explored at the bench, subsequently being trialed at the bedsi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Iyngkaran, M. Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18737
id doaj-61f8cadff7ec4621b718b0d3d7cc069b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61f8cadff7ec4621b718b0d3d7cc069b2020-11-25T03:39:17ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology1179-54682015-01-019s110.4137/CMC.S18737Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment CriteriaP. Iyngkaran0M. Thomas1Flinders University, NT Medical School, Darwin, Australia.Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic condition usually without cure. Significant developments, particularly those addressing pathophysiology, mainly started at the bench. This approach has seen many clinical observations initially explored at the bench, subsequently being trialed at the bedside, and eventually translated into clinical practice. This evidence, however, has several limitations, importantly the generalizability or external validity. We now acknowledge that clinical management of CHF is more complicated than merely translating bench-to-bedside evidence in a linear fashion. This review aims to help explore this evolving area from an Australian perspective. We describe the continuation of research once core evidence is established and describe how clinician–scientist collaboration with a bedside-to-bench view can help enhance evidence translation and generalizability. We describe why an extension of the available evidence or generating new evidence is occasionally needed to address the increasingly diverse cohort of patients. Finally, we explore some of the tools used by basic scientists and clinicians to develop evidence and describe the ones we feel may be most beneficial.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18737
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Iyngkaran
M. Thomas
spellingShingle P. Iyngkaran
M. Thomas
Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
author_facet P. Iyngkaran
M. Thomas
author_sort P. Iyngkaran
title Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
title_short Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
title_full Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
title_fullStr Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Bedside–to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients who do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria
title_sort bedside–to-bench translational research for chronic heart failure: creating an agenda for clients who do not meet trial enrollment criteria
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
issn 1179-5468
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic condition usually without cure. Significant developments, particularly those addressing pathophysiology, mainly started at the bench. This approach has seen many clinical observations initially explored at the bench, subsequently being trialed at the bedside, and eventually translated into clinical practice. This evidence, however, has several limitations, importantly the generalizability or external validity. We now acknowledge that clinical management of CHF is more complicated than merely translating bench-to-bedside evidence in a linear fashion. This review aims to help explore this evolving area from an Australian perspective. We describe the continuation of research once core evidence is established and describe how clinician–scientist collaboration with a bedside-to-bench view can help enhance evidence translation and generalizability. We describe why an extension of the available evidence or generating new evidence is occasionally needed to address the increasingly diverse cohort of patients. Finally, we explore some of the tools used by basic scientists and clinicians to develop evidence and describe the ones we feel may be most beneficial.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18737
work_keys_str_mv AT piyngkaran bedsidetobenchtranslationalresearchforchronicheartfailurecreatinganagendaforclientswhodonotmeettrialenrollmentcriteria
AT mthomas bedsidetobenchtranslationalresearchforchronicheartfailurecreatinganagendaforclientswhodonotmeettrialenrollmentcriteria
_version_ 1724539862820847616