Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI

The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trikoz Elena, Gulyaeva Elena, Belyaev Konstantin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf
id doaj-61f58bd375a34132990e83856a8180c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61f58bd375a34132990e83856a8180c32021-04-02T16:40:27ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-012240300510.1051/e3sconf/202022403005e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AITrikoz Elena0Gulyaeva Elena1Belyaev Konstantin2Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian FederationCompany Garant; Russian New University (RosNOU)The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of the article used the methodology for collecting data on legislative acts and legal regulation in the field under research. A number of federal and regional legal acts were analyzed using systemic-structural and formal-dogmatic methods, including the research of their practical orientation and effectiveness for modern challenges.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trikoz Elena
Gulyaeva Elena
Belyaev Konstantin
spellingShingle Trikoz Elena
Gulyaeva Elena
Belyaev Konstantin
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Trikoz Elena
Gulyaeva Elena
Belyaev Konstantin
author_sort Trikoz Elena
title Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
title_short Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
title_full Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
title_fullStr Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
title_full_unstemmed Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
title_sort russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of ai
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of the article used the methodology for collecting data on legislative acts and legal regulation in the field under research. A number of federal and regional legal acts were analyzed using systemic-structural and formal-dogmatic methods, including the research of their practical orientation and effectiveness for modern challenges.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT trikozelena russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai
AT gulyaevaelena russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai
AT belyaevkonstantin russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai
_version_ 1721555845750194176