Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf |
id |
doaj-61f58bd375a34132990e83856a8180c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-61f58bd375a34132990e83856a8180c32021-04-02T16:40:27ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-012240300510.1051/e3sconf/202022403005e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AITrikoz Elena0Gulyaeva Elena1Belyaev Konstantin2Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian FederationCompany Garant; Russian New University (RosNOU)The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of the article used the methodology for collecting data on legislative acts and legal regulation in the field under research. A number of federal and regional legal acts were analyzed using systemic-structural and formal-dogmatic methods, including the research of their practical orientation and effectiveness for modern challenges.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Trikoz Elena Gulyaeva Elena Belyaev Konstantin |
spellingShingle |
Trikoz Elena Gulyaeva Elena Belyaev Konstantin Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Trikoz Elena Gulyaeva Elena Belyaev Konstantin |
author_sort |
Trikoz Elena |
title |
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI |
title_short |
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI |
title_full |
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI |
title_fullStr |
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI |
title_full_unstemmed |
Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI |
title_sort |
russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of ai |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of the article used the methodology for collecting data on legislative acts and legal regulation in the field under research. A number of federal and regional legal acts were analyzed using systemic-structural and formal-dogmatic methods, including the research of their practical orientation and effectiveness for modern challenges. |
url |
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/84/e3sconf_TPACEE2020_03005.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT trikozelena russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai AT gulyaevaelena russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai AT belyaevkonstantin russianexperienceofusingdigitaltechnologiesandlegalrisksofai |
_version_ |
1721555845750194176 |