Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets

The banning of the use of antibiotics as feed additive has accelerated investigations of alternative feed additives in animal production. This experiment investigated the effect of pure citric acid or acidifier blend supplementation as substitute for antibiotic growth promoters on growth performance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. T. Ahmed, J. A. Hwang, J. Hoon, H. S. Mun, C. J. Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 2014-01-01
Series:Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-27-1-93-11.pdf
id doaj-61e863dd7a1b45818f35a5a176ecee4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61e863dd7a1b45818f35a5a176ecee4a2020-11-24T22:06:38ZengAsian-Australasian Association of Animal Production SocietiesAsian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences1011-23671976-55172014-01-012719310010.5713/ajas.2013.134114794Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned PigletsS. T. AhmedJ. A. HwangJ. HoonH. S. MunC. J. YangThe banning of the use of antibiotics as feed additive has accelerated investigations of alternative feed additives in animal production. This experiment investigated the effect of pure citric acid or acidifier blend supplementation as substitute for antibiotic growth promoters on growth performance, fecal microbial count, and humoral immunity in weaned piglets challenged with Salmonella enterica serover Typhimurium and Escherichia coli KCTC 2571. A total of 60 newly weaned piglets (crossbred, 28-d-old; average 8 kg initial weight) were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. Dietary treatments included NC (negative control; basal diet), PC (positive control; basal diet+0.002% apramycin), T1 (basal diet+0.5% pure citric acid), and T2 (basal diet+0.4% acidifier blend). All piglets were orally challenged with 5 mL of culture fluid containing 2.3×108 cfu/mL of E. coli KCTC 2571 and 5.9×108 cfu/mL of S. typhimurium at the beginning of the experiment. The PC group showed the highest ADG and ADFI, whereas gain:feed was improved in the PC and T1 group (p<0.05). All dietary treatments showed significant reduction in fecal counts of Salmonella and E. coli, compared to NC (p<0.05), with PC being better than T1 and T2. Significant elevation in fecal Lactobacillus spp. counts was shown by treatments with T1, T2, and PC, whereas Bacillus spp. counts were increased by treatment with T1 and T2 compared to NC and PC diet (p<0.05). Serum IgG concentration was increased by T1 diet (p<0.05), whereas IgM and IgA were not significantly affected by any of the dietary treatments (p>0.05). From these above results, it can be concluded that, as alternatives to antibiotics dietary acidification with pure citric acid or acidifiers blend did not fully ameliorate the negative effects of microbial challenges in respect of growth performance and microbial environment, however improved immunity suggested further research with different dose levels.http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-27-1-93-11.pdfCitric AcidAcidifier BlendGrowth PerformanceMicroorganismImmunityChallenged Piglets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. T. Ahmed
J. A. Hwang
J. Hoon
H. S. Mun
C. J. Yang
spellingShingle S. T. Ahmed
J. A. Hwang
J. Hoon
H. S. Mun
C. J. Yang
Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Citric Acid
Acidifier Blend
Growth Performance
Microorganism
Immunity
Challenged Piglets
author_facet S. T. Ahmed
J. A. Hwang
J. Hoon
H. S. Mun
C. J. Yang
author_sort S. T. Ahmed
title Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
title_short Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
title_full Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
title_fullStr Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Single and Blend Acidifiers as Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Fecal Microflora, and Humoral Immunity in Weaned Piglets
title_sort comparison of single and blend acidifiers as alternative to antibiotics on growth performance, fecal microflora, and humoral immunity in weaned piglets
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
series Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
issn 1011-2367
1976-5517
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The banning of the use of antibiotics as feed additive has accelerated investigations of alternative feed additives in animal production. This experiment investigated the effect of pure citric acid or acidifier blend supplementation as substitute for antibiotic growth promoters on growth performance, fecal microbial count, and humoral immunity in weaned piglets challenged with Salmonella enterica serover Typhimurium and Escherichia coli KCTC 2571. A total of 60 newly weaned piglets (crossbred, 28-d-old; average 8 kg initial weight) were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. Dietary treatments included NC (negative control; basal diet), PC (positive control; basal diet+0.002% apramycin), T1 (basal diet+0.5% pure citric acid), and T2 (basal diet+0.4% acidifier blend). All piglets were orally challenged with 5 mL of culture fluid containing 2.3×108 cfu/mL of E. coli KCTC 2571 and 5.9×108 cfu/mL of S. typhimurium at the beginning of the experiment. The PC group showed the highest ADG and ADFI, whereas gain:feed was improved in the PC and T1 group (p<0.05). All dietary treatments showed significant reduction in fecal counts of Salmonella and E. coli, compared to NC (p<0.05), with PC being better than T1 and T2. Significant elevation in fecal Lactobacillus spp. counts was shown by treatments with T1, T2, and PC, whereas Bacillus spp. counts were increased by treatment with T1 and T2 compared to NC and PC diet (p<0.05). Serum IgG concentration was increased by T1 diet (p<0.05), whereas IgM and IgA were not significantly affected by any of the dietary treatments (p>0.05). From these above results, it can be concluded that, as alternatives to antibiotics dietary acidification with pure citric acid or acidifiers blend did not fully ameliorate the negative effects of microbial challenges in respect of growth performance and microbial environment, however improved immunity suggested further research with different dose levels.
topic Citric Acid
Acidifier Blend
Growth Performance
Microorganism
Immunity
Challenged Piglets
url http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-27-1-93-11.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stahmed comparisonofsingleandblendacidifiersasalternativetoantibioticsongrowthperformancefecalmicrofloraandhumoralimmunityinweanedpiglets
AT jahwang comparisonofsingleandblendacidifiersasalternativetoantibioticsongrowthperformancefecalmicrofloraandhumoralimmunityinweanedpiglets
AT jhoon comparisonofsingleandblendacidifiersasalternativetoantibioticsongrowthperformancefecalmicrofloraandhumoralimmunityinweanedpiglets
AT hsmun comparisonofsingleandblendacidifiersasalternativetoantibioticsongrowthperformancefecalmicrofloraandhumoralimmunityinweanedpiglets
AT cjyang comparisonofsingleandblendacidifiersasalternativetoantibioticsongrowthperformancefecalmicrofloraandhumoralimmunityinweanedpiglets
_version_ 1725822711952834560