EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION

The aim of this study was to determine team cohesion of handballplayers who were actively engaged in sport in various categories. The study group consisted of a total of 607 handball players, 317 female and 290 male, selected by random method and from 11 provinces of Turkey according to the some fac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: İlyas Görgüt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ümit doğan üstün 2017-04-01
Series:Sportif Bakış Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sportifbakis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/c4s1.33-43.pdf
id doaj-61e6dc2c2da64cf4a858604c6f646b4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61e6dc2c2da64cf4a858604c6f646b4b2020-11-25T03:19:57Zengümit doğan üstünSportif Bakış Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi2148-905X2148-905X2017-04-01413343EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESIONİlyas GörgütThe aim of this study was to determine team cohesion of handballplayers who were actively engaged in sport in various categories. The study group consisted of a total of 607 handball players, 317 female and 290 male, selected by random method and from 11 provinces of Turkey according to the some factors. When we examine the age distributions of the participants, 121 athletes appear to be 13 years and under, 309 athletes 14-18 years, 94 athletes 19-23 years, 54 athletes 24-28 years and 29 athletes 29 years and over. In addition, 186 of them expressed their education situation as middle school, 253 of them expressed their education situation as high school and 168 of them expressed their education situation as university. Personal information form and team cohesion scale, developed by Widmeyer et al. (1985) and adapted to Turkish by Moralı (1994), were used as a data collecting tools. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to measure whether the obtained data showed normal distribution or not and nonparametric tests were used to determine the subscale scores because they didn’t show normal disturbance. For binary comparisons Mann Whitney U test, for multiple comparisons Kruskal Wallis variance and for the difference between significant groups Bonferroni Mann Whitney U test were used. As a result of the research, there were significant differences in scale subscale scores in terms of gender, age, educational status, sports experience, income and province variables of handball players.http://www.sportifbakis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/c4s1.33-43.pdfhandball playerteam cohesionexamine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author İlyas Görgüt
spellingShingle İlyas Görgüt
EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
Sportif Bakış Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
handball player
team cohesion
examine
author_facet İlyas Görgüt
author_sort İlyas Görgüt
title EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
title_short EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
title_full EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
title_fullStr EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
title_full_unstemmed EXAMINATION OF HANDBALL PLAYERS’ TEAM COHESION
title_sort examination of handball players’ team cohesion
publisher ümit doğan üstün
series Sportif Bakış Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
issn 2148-905X
2148-905X
publishDate 2017-04-01
description The aim of this study was to determine team cohesion of handballplayers who were actively engaged in sport in various categories. The study group consisted of a total of 607 handball players, 317 female and 290 male, selected by random method and from 11 provinces of Turkey according to the some factors. When we examine the age distributions of the participants, 121 athletes appear to be 13 years and under, 309 athletes 14-18 years, 94 athletes 19-23 years, 54 athletes 24-28 years and 29 athletes 29 years and over. In addition, 186 of them expressed their education situation as middle school, 253 of them expressed their education situation as high school and 168 of them expressed their education situation as university. Personal information form and team cohesion scale, developed by Widmeyer et al. (1985) and adapted to Turkish by Moralı (1994), were used as a data collecting tools. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to measure whether the obtained data showed normal distribution or not and nonparametric tests were used to determine the subscale scores because they didn’t show normal disturbance. For binary comparisons Mann Whitney U test, for multiple comparisons Kruskal Wallis variance and for the difference between significant groups Bonferroni Mann Whitney U test were used. As a result of the research, there were significant differences in scale subscale scores in terms of gender, age, educational status, sports experience, income and province variables of handball players.
topic handball player
team cohesion
examine
url http://www.sportifbakis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/c4s1.33-43.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ilyasgorgut examinationofhandballplayersteamcohesion
_version_ 1724620079293792256