Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-05-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
Online Access: | http://www.rbej.com/content/9/1/60 |
id |
doaj-61d661f778c94e97838647e00d854e5c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-61d661f778c94e97838647e00d854e5c2020-11-24T21:23:49ZengBMCReproductive Biology and Endocrinology1477-78272011-05-01916010.1186/1477-7827-9-60Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?Verheyen GretaCamus MichelVan den Abbeel EtienneVan Landuyt LisbetStoop DominicDevroey Paul<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3.</p> http://www.rbej.com/content/9/1/60 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Verheyen Greta Camus Michel Van den Abbeel Etienne Van Landuyt Lisbet Stoop Dominic Devroey Paul |
spellingShingle |
Verheyen Greta Camus Michel Van den Abbeel Etienne Van Landuyt Lisbet Stoop Dominic Devroey Paul Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
author_facet |
Verheyen Greta Camus Michel Van den Abbeel Etienne Van Landuyt Lisbet Stoop Dominic Devroey Paul |
author_sort |
Verheyen Greta |
title |
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_short |
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_full |
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_fullStr |
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_sort |
should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
issn |
1477-7827 |
publishDate |
2011-05-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3.</p> |
url |
http://www.rbej.com/content/9/1/60 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT verheyengreta shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT camusmichel shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT vandenabbeeletienne shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT vanlanduytlisbet shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT stoopdominic shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT devroeypaul shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 |
_version_ |
1725991140961812480 |