Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Verheyen Greta, Camus Michel, Van den Abbeel Etienne, Van Landuyt Lisbet, Stoop Dominic, Devroey Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Online Access:http://www.rbej.com/content/9/1/60
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3.</p>
ISSN:1477-7827