Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns

We compared pollination and seed set of bicolor and concolor morphs in self-incompatible, Viola pedata over two seasons in two populations of unequal sizes.  One population grew on a wooded slope (CR) and the second on an exposed glade (SNR).  Both were burned in 2014. The number of flowers produced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Bernhardt, Retha Edens-Meier, Dowen Jocson, Justin Zweck, Zong-Xin Ren, Gerardo R. Camilo, Michael Arduser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Enviroquest Ltd. 2016-11-01
Series:Journal of Pollination Ecology
Online Access:https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/403
id doaj-61b3e090f1124ea4be0d8d98ef92e2ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61b3e090f1124ea4be0d8d98ef92e2ee2021-07-28T12:30:21ZengEnviroquest Ltd.Journal of Pollination Ecology1920-76032016-11-0119577010.26786/1920-7603(2016)3227Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burnsPeter Bernhardt0Retha Edens-Meier1Dowen Jocson2Justin Zweck3Zong-Xin Ren4Gerardo R. CamiloMichael Arduser5Saint Louis UniversitySaint Louis UniversitySaint Louis UniversitySaint Louis UniversityKunming Institute of Botany (Chinese Academy of Sciences)Missouri Department of Conservation (retired)We compared pollination and seed set of bicolor and concolor morphs in self-incompatible, Viola pedata over two seasons in two populations of unequal sizes.  One population grew on a wooded slope (CR) and the second on an exposed glade (SNR).  Both were burned in 2014. The number of flowers produced by concolor plants at SNR was higher in 2014 while the number of flowering bicolors increased at CR in 2015. Petal temperatures, regardless of site, showed that dark purple, posterior petals of bicolors were consistently warmer than their own mauve-lilac, anterior (lip) petals and the all mauve petals of concolors. Major pollen vectors were female bees (Andrenidae, Apidae and Halictidae) but polylectic, Andrena carlinii dominated both sites.  Bees foraged on flowers upside down or right side up but neither mode correlated with either morph. Bees foraged preferentially on concolor at both sites.  Pistils containing pollen tubes were higher in concolor pistils at both sites with a marginally greater number of  tubes penetrating concolor ovules regardless of site or year.  While both populations produced more seeds in 2014 SNR plants always produced more seeds than CR plants.  The increasing numbers of bicolor plants at CR in 2015 suggested that bicolors may equal or outnumber concolors when dark petals offer additional warmth to ectothermic pollinators in a shady (cooler) forest vs. an open, sunny glade. Subtle environmental factors may give a floral trait a selective advantage influencing fitness in an unbalanced polymorphism persisting in localized populations.https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/403
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Bernhardt
Retha Edens-Meier
Dowen Jocson
Justin Zweck
Zong-Xin Ren
Gerardo R. Camilo
Michael Arduser
spellingShingle Peter Bernhardt
Retha Edens-Meier
Dowen Jocson
Justin Zweck
Zong-Xin Ren
Gerardo R. Camilo
Michael Arduser
Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
Journal of Pollination Ecology
author_facet Peter Bernhardt
Retha Edens-Meier
Dowen Jocson
Justin Zweck
Zong-Xin Ren
Gerardo R. Camilo
Michael Arduser
author_sort Peter Bernhardt
title Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
title_short Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
title_full Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
title_fullStr Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
title_full_unstemmed Comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>Viola pedata</i> (Violaceae) following controlled burns
title_sort comparative floral ecology of bicolor and concolor morphs of <i>viola pedata</i> (violaceae) following controlled burns
publisher Enviroquest Ltd.
series Journal of Pollination Ecology
issn 1920-7603
publishDate 2016-11-01
description We compared pollination and seed set of bicolor and concolor morphs in self-incompatible, Viola pedata over two seasons in two populations of unequal sizes.  One population grew on a wooded slope (CR) and the second on an exposed glade (SNR).  Both were burned in 2014. The number of flowers produced by concolor plants at SNR was higher in 2014 while the number of flowering bicolors increased at CR in 2015. Petal temperatures, regardless of site, showed that dark purple, posterior petals of bicolors were consistently warmer than their own mauve-lilac, anterior (lip) petals and the all mauve petals of concolors. Major pollen vectors were female bees (Andrenidae, Apidae and Halictidae) but polylectic, Andrena carlinii dominated both sites.  Bees foraged on flowers upside down or right side up but neither mode correlated with either morph. Bees foraged preferentially on concolor at both sites.  Pistils containing pollen tubes were higher in concolor pistils at both sites with a marginally greater number of  tubes penetrating concolor ovules regardless of site or year.  While both populations produced more seeds in 2014 SNR plants always produced more seeds than CR plants.  The increasing numbers of bicolor plants at CR in 2015 suggested that bicolors may equal or outnumber concolors when dark petals offer additional warmth to ectothermic pollinators in a shady (cooler) forest vs. an open, sunny glade. Subtle environmental factors may give a floral trait a selective advantage influencing fitness in an unbalanced polymorphism persisting in localized populations.
url https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/403
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbernhardt comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT rethaedensmeier comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT dowenjocson comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT justinzweck comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT zongxinren comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT gerardorcamilo comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
AT michaelarduser comparativefloralecologyofbicolorandconcolormorphsofiviolapedataiviolaceaefollowingcontrolledburns
_version_ 1721278553582993408