Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account
<span>The parallel rule activation and rule synthesis (PRAS) model is a computational model for generalisation in category learning, proposed by Vandierendonck (1995). An important concept underlying the PRAS model is the distinction between primary and secondary generalisation. In Vandierendo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2010-10-01
|
Series: | Psychologica Belgica |
Online Access: | http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/59 |
id |
doaj-61a2d0fb28194058b69611aa157150be |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-61a2d0fb28194058b69611aa157150be2020-11-24T21:04:13ZengUbiquity PressPsychologica Belgica0033-28792054-670X2010-10-01503-415317310.5334/pb-50-3-4-15359Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based AccountYves Rosseel0Maarten De Schryver1Department of Data Analysis, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Data Analysis, Ghent University<span>The parallel rule activation and rule synthesis (PRAS) model is a computational model for generalisation in category learning, proposed by Vandierendonck (1995). An important concept underlying the PRAS model is the distinction between primary and secondary generalisation. In Vandierendonck (1995), an empirical study is reported that provides support for the concept of secondary generalisation. In this paper, we re-analyse the data reported by Vandierendonck (1995) by fitting three different variants of the Generalised Context Model (GCM) which do not rely on secondary generalisation. Although some of the GCM variants outperformed the PRAS model in terms of global fit, they all have difficulty in providing a qualitatively good fit of a specific critical pattern.</span>http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/59 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yves Rosseel Maarten De Schryver |
spellingShingle |
Yves Rosseel Maarten De Schryver Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account Psychologica Belgica |
author_facet |
Yves Rosseel Maarten De Schryver |
author_sort |
Yves Rosseel |
title |
Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account |
title_short |
Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account |
title_full |
Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account |
title_fullStr |
Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account |
title_full_unstemmed |
Secondary Generalisation in Categorisation: An Exemplar-based Account |
title_sort |
secondary generalisation in categorisation: an exemplar-based account |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Psychologica Belgica |
issn |
0033-2879 2054-670X |
publishDate |
2010-10-01 |
description |
<span>The parallel rule activation and rule synthesis (PRAS) model is a computational model for generalisation in category learning, proposed by Vandierendonck (1995). An important concept underlying the PRAS model is the distinction between primary and secondary generalisation. In Vandierendonck (1995), an empirical study is reported that provides support for the concept of secondary generalisation. In this paper, we re-analyse the data reported by Vandierendonck (1995) by fitting three different variants of the Generalised Context Model (GCM) which do not rely on secondary generalisation. Although some of the GCM variants outperformed the PRAS model in terms of global fit, they all have difficulty in providing a qualitatively good fit of a specific critical pattern.</span> |
url |
http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/59 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yvesrosseel secondarygeneralisationincategorisationanexemplarbasedaccount AT maartendeschryver secondarygeneralisationincategorisationanexemplarbasedaccount |
_version_ |
1716771410436685824 |