Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
The strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-618f9a15f9d34515be355e4218f0e07e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-618f9a15f9d34515be355e4218f0e07e2020-11-25T01:07:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01136e019955410.1371/journal.pone.0199554Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.Wanja WolffLorena BaumannChris EnglertThe strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and the frequency of a set of questionable research practices (QRP) in ego depletion research. A literature search resulted in 1721 researchers who had previously published on ego depletion. They were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. The respondents (n = 277), on average, had published over three papers on ego depletion, and had completed more than two additional, unpublished studies. Respondents indicated that in more than 40% of their studies, results were similar in magnitude to those reported in the existing literature, and more than 60% reported conducting a priori power analyses. 39.2% of respondents were aware of other researchers who engaged in the surveyed QRP's, while 37.7% affirmed to have employed said QRP's. These results underline the importance of reducing QRP's to reliably test the validity of the ego depletion effect.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wanja Wolff Lorena Baumann Chris Englert |
spellingShingle |
Wanja Wolff Lorena Baumann Chris Englert Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Wanja Wolff Lorena Baumann Chris Englert |
author_sort |
Wanja Wolff |
title |
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
title_short |
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
title_full |
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
title_fullStr |
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
title_sort |
self-reports from behind the scenes: questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
The strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and the frequency of a set of questionable research practices (QRP) in ego depletion research. A literature search resulted in 1721 researchers who had previously published on ego depletion. They were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. The respondents (n = 277), on average, had published over three papers on ego depletion, and had completed more than two additional, unpublished studies. Respondents indicated that in more than 40% of their studies, results were similar in magnitude to those reported in the existing literature, and more than 60% reported conducting a priori power analyses. 39.2% of respondents were aware of other researchers who engaged in the surveyed QRP's, while 37.7% affirmed to have employed said QRP's. These results underline the importance of reducing QRP's to reliably test the validity of the ego depletion effect. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wanjawolff selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch AT lorenabaumann selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch AT chrisenglert selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch |
_version_ |
1725187750460653568 |