Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.

The strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wanja Wolff, Lorena Baumann, Chris Englert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render
id doaj-618f9a15f9d34515be355e4218f0e07e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-618f9a15f9d34515be355e4218f0e07e2020-11-25T01:07:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01136e019955410.1371/journal.pone.0199554Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.Wanja WolffLorena BaumannChris EnglertThe strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and the frequency of a set of questionable research practices (QRP) in ego depletion research. A literature search resulted in 1721 researchers who had previously published on ego depletion. They were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. The respondents (n = 277), on average, had published over three papers on ego depletion, and had completed more than two additional, unpublished studies. Respondents indicated that in more than 40% of their studies, results were similar in magnitude to those reported in the existing literature, and more than 60% reported conducting a priori power analyses. 39.2% of respondents were aware of other researchers who engaged in the surveyed QRP's, while 37.7% affirmed to have employed said QRP's. These results underline the importance of reducing QRP's to reliably test the validity of the ego depletion effect.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wanja Wolff
Lorena Baumann
Chris Englert
spellingShingle Wanja Wolff
Lorena Baumann
Chris Englert
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Wanja Wolff
Lorena Baumann
Chris Englert
author_sort Wanja Wolff
title Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
title_short Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
title_full Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
title_fullStr Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
title_full_unstemmed Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
title_sort self-reports from behind the scenes: questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The strength model of self-control is one of the most influential and well-established models of self-regulation in social psychology. However, recent attempts to replicate the ego depletion effect have sometimes failed. The goal of this study is to investigate self-reported replication rates and the frequency of a set of questionable research practices (QRP) in ego depletion research. A literature search resulted in 1721 researchers who had previously published on ego depletion. They were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. The respondents (n = 277), on average, had published over three papers on ego depletion, and had completed more than two additional, unpublished studies. Respondents indicated that in more than 40% of their studies, results were similar in magnitude to those reported in the existing literature, and more than 60% reported conducting a priori power analyses. 39.2% of respondents were aware of other researchers who engaged in the surveyed QRP's, while 37.7% affirmed to have employed said QRP's. These results underline the importance of reducing QRP's to reliably test the validity of the ego depletion effect.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6016937?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT wanjawolff selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch
AT lorenabaumann selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch
AT chrisenglert selfreportsfrombehindthescenesquestionableresearchpracticesandratesofreplicationinegodepletionresearch
_version_ 1725187750460653568