Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition

The article outlines some similarities between the perspectives adopted by Shaun Gallagher and William James. In particular, assuming that the issue of representation in cognitive systems provides a valuable starting point and testing ground for verifying James’ possible contribution to enactivism,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guido
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Mimesis Edizioni, Milano 2021-04-01
Series:Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2021.0002
id doaj-6182a17c0e6842ba8f6269d0ef3ec1a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6182a17c0e6842ba8f6269d0ef3ec1a92021-05-02T13:25:53ZdeuMimesis Edizioni, MilanoRivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia2039-46672239-26292021-04-01121163010.4453/rifp.2021.0002Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognitionGuido0BaggioThe article outlines some similarities between the perspectives adopted by Shaun Gallagher and William James. In particular, assuming that the issue of representation in cognitive systems provides a valuable starting point and testing ground for verifying James’ possible contribution to enactivism, we argue that there is a considerable degree of similarity between Gallagher’s and James’ non-representational models of direct perception. Furthermore, we propose that by combining James’s theory of time and spatial perception with Gallagher’s Husserlian-inspired theory of retentional-protentional structure, we can strengthen the theoretical assumptions of enactivism, integrating elements taken from phenomenology and aspects of Jamesian pragmatics. Understood in this way, James’ enactive theory of action and perceptual causality provides a promising opportunity for an innovative and coherent enactivist research program.https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2021.0002enactivismpragmatism4e cognitionwilliam jamesshaun gallagher
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guido
spellingShingle Guido
Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
enactivism
pragmatism
4e cognition
william james
shaun gallagher
author_facet Guido
author_sort Guido
title Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
title_short Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
title_full Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
title_fullStr Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
title_full_unstemmed Making enactivism even more pragmatic: The Jamesian legacy in Shaun Gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
title_sort making enactivism even more pragmatic: the jamesian legacy in shaun gallagher’s enactivist approach to cognition
publisher Mimesis Edizioni, Milano
series Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
issn 2039-4667
2239-2629
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The article outlines some similarities between the perspectives adopted by Shaun Gallagher and William James. In particular, assuming that the issue of representation in cognitive systems provides a valuable starting point and testing ground for verifying James’ possible contribution to enactivism, we argue that there is a considerable degree of similarity between Gallagher’s and James’ non-representational models of direct perception. Furthermore, we propose that by combining James’s theory of time and spatial perception with Gallagher’s Husserlian-inspired theory of retentional-protentional structure, we can strengthen the theoretical assumptions of enactivism, integrating elements taken from phenomenology and aspects of Jamesian pragmatics. Understood in this way, James’ enactive theory of action and perceptual causality provides a promising opportunity for an innovative and coherent enactivist research program.
topic enactivism
pragmatism
4e cognition
william james
shaun gallagher
url https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2021.0002
work_keys_str_mv AT guido makingenactivismevenmorepragmaticthejamesianlegacyinshaungallaghersenactivistapproachtocognition
_version_ 1721491139214704640