Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers

Abstract Background Traditional landmark thoracostomy technique has a known complication rate up to 30%. The goal of this study is to determine whether novice providers could more accurately identify the appropriate intercostal site for thoracostomy by ultrasound guidance. Methods 33 emergency medic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindsay A. Taylor, Michael J. Vitto, Michael Joyce, Jordan Tozer, David P. Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-10-01
Series:Critical Ultrasound Journal
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-018-0108-1
id doaj-617543c9cc5a412e9394db75a3751486
record_format Article
spelling doaj-617543c9cc5a412e9394db75a37514862020-11-25T01:44:57ZengSpringerOpenCritical Ultrasound Journal2036-31762036-79022018-10-011011510.1186/s13089-018-0108-1Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteersLindsay A. Taylor0Michael J. Vitto1Michael Joyce2Jordan Tozer3David P. Evans4Virginia Commonwealth University Emergency MedicineVirginia Commonwealth University Emergency MedicineVirginia Commonwealth University Emergency MedicineVirginia Commonwealth University Emergency MedicineVirginia Commonwealth University Emergency MedicineAbstract Background Traditional landmark thoracostomy technique has a known complication rate up to 30%. The goal of this study is to determine whether novice providers could more accurately identify the appropriate intercostal site for thoracostomy by ultrasound guidance. Methods 33 emergency medicine residents and medical students volunteered to participate in this study during routine thoracostomy tube education. A healthy volunteer was used as the standardized patient for this study. An experienced physician sonographer used ultrasound to locate a site at mid-axillary line between ribs 4 and 5 and marked the site with invisible ink that can only be revealed with a commercially available UV LED light. Participants were asked to identify the thoracostomy site by placing an opaque marker where they would make their incision. The distance from the correct insertion site was measured in rib spaces. The participants were then given a brief hands-on training session using ultrasound to identify the diaphragm and count rib spaces. The participants were then asked to use ultrasound to identify the proper thoracostomy site and mark it with an opaque marker. The distance from the proper insertion site was measured and recorded in rib spaces. Results The participants correctly identified the pre-determined intercostal space using palpation 48% (16/33) of the time, versus the ultrasound group who identified the proper intercostal space 91% (30/33) of the time. On average, the traditional technique was placed 0.88 rib spaces away (95 CI 0.43–1.03), while the ultrasound-guided technique was placed 0.09 rib spaces away (95 CI 0.0–0.19) [P = 0.003]. Conclusions The ability to accurately locate the correct intercostal space for thoracostomy incision was improved under ultrasound guidance. Further studies are warranted to determine if this ultrasound-guided technique will decrease complications with chest tube insertion and improve patient outcomes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-018-0108-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lindsay A. Taylor
Michael J. Vitto
Michael Joyce
Jordan Tozer
David P. Evans
spellingShingle Lindsay A. Taylor
Michael J. Vitto
Michael Joyce
Jordan Tozer
David P. Evans
Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
Critical Ultrasound Journal
author_facet Lindsay A. Taylor
Michael J. Vitto
Michael Joyce
Jordan Tozer
David P. Evans
author_sort Lindsay A. Taylor
title Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
title_short Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
title_full Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
title_sort ultrasound-guided thoracostomy site identification in healthy volunteers
publisher SpringerOpen
series Critical Ultrasound Journal
issn 2036-3176
2036-7902
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract Background Traditional landmark thoracostomy technique has a known complication rate up to 30%. The goal of this study is to determine whether novice providers could more accurately identify the appropriate intercostal site for thoracostomy by ultrasound guidance. Methods 33 emergency medicine residents and medical students volunteered to participate in this study during routine thoracostomy tube education. A healthy volunteer was used as the standardized patient for this study. An experienced physician sonographer used ultrasound to locate a site at mid-axillary line between ribs 4 and 5 and marked the site with invisible ink that can only be revealed with a commercially available UV LED light. Participants were asked to identify the thoracostomy site by placing an opaque marker where they would make their incision. The distance from the correct insertion site was measured in rib spaces. The participants were then given a brief hands-on training session using ultrasound to identify the diaphragm and count rib spaces. The participants were then asked to use ultrasound to identify the proper thoracostomy site and mark it with an opaque marker. The distance from the proper insertion site was measured and recorded in rib spaces. Results The participants correctly identified the pre-determined intercostal space using palpation 48% (16/33) of the time, versus the ultrasound group who identified the proper intercostal space 91% (30/33) of the time. On average, the traditional technique was placed 0.88 rib spaces away (95 CI 0.43–1.03), while the ultrasound-guided technique was placed 0.09 rib spaces away (95 CI 0.0–0.19) [P = 0.003]. Conclusions The ability to accurately locate the correct intercostal space for thoracostomy incision was improved under ultrasound guidance. Further studies are warranted to determine if this ultrasound-guided technique will decrease complications with chest tube insertion and improve patient outcomes.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-018-0108-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsayataylor ultrasoundguidedthoracostomysiteidentificationinhealthyvolunteers
AT michaeljvitto ultrasoundguidedthoracostomysiteidentificationinhealthyvolunteers
AT michaeljoyce ultrasoundguidedthoracostomysiteidentificationinhealthyvolunteers
AT jordantozer ultrasoundguidedthoracostomysiteidentificationinhealthyvolunteers
AT davidpevans ultrasoundguidedthoracostomysiteidentificationinhealthyvolunteers
_version_ 1725026116215767040