Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Takeda G-protein coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) are the two known bile acid (BA) sensitive receptors and are expressed in the intestine and liver as well as in extra-enterohepatic tissues. The physiological effects of extra-enterohepatic FXR/TRG5 remain unclear. Further, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel A. J. Trammell, Jens S. Svenningsen, Jens J. Holst, Matthew P. Gillum, Rune E. Kuhre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/10/2371
id doaj-617308ddb86a41f78757a8e47bda6c0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-617308ddb86a41f78757a8e47bda6c0e2020-11-25T02:18:54ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492020-05-01252371237110.3390/molecules25102371Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5Samuel A. J. Trammell0Jens S. Svenningsen1Jens J. Holst2Matthew P. Gillum3Rune E. Kuhre4NNF Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Nutrient and Metabolite Sensing Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkNNF Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Nutrient and Metabolite Sensing Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkNNF Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Nutrient and Metabolite Sensing Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkFarnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Takeda G-protein coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) are the two known bile acid (BA) sensitive receptors and are expressed in the intestine and liver as well as in extra-enterohepatic tissues. The physiological effects of extra-enterohepatic FXR/TRG5 remain unclear. Further, the extent BAs escape liver reabsorption and how they interact with extra-enterohepatic FXR/TGR5 is understudied. We investigated if hepatic BA reuptake differed between BAs agonistic for FXR and TGR5 compared to non-agonists in the rat. Blood was collected from the portal vein and inferior caval vein from anesthetized rats before and 5, 20, 30, and 40 min post stimulation with sulfated cholecystokinin-8. Plasma concentrations of 20 different BAs were assessed by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Total portal vein BA AUC was 3–4 times greater than in the vena cava inferior (2.7 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 mM x min, <i>p</i> < 0.01, n = 8) with total unconjugated BAs being 2–3-fold higher than total conjugated BAs (AUC 8–10 higher <i>p</i> < 0.05 for both). However, in both cases, absolute ratios varied greatly among different BAs. The average hepatic reuptake of BAs agonistic for FXR/TGR5 was similar to non-agonists. However, as the sum of non-agonist BAs in vena portae was 2–3-fold higher than the sum agonist (<i>p</i> < 0.05), the peripheral BA pool was composed mostly of non-agonist BAs. We conclude that hepatic BA reuptake varies substantially by type and does not favor FXR/TGR5 BAs agonists.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/10/2371hepatic bile acid reuptakebile acid spill overbile acids in plasmaportal vein versus peripheryFXR and TGR5 receptors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samuel A. J. Trammell
Jens S. Svenningsen
Jens J. Holst
Matthew P. Gillum
Rune E. Kuhre
spellingShingle Samuel A. J. Trammell
Jens S. Svenningsen
Jens J. Holst
Matthew P. Gillum
Rune E. Kuhre
Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
Molecules
hepatic bile acid reuptake
bile acid spill over
bile acids in plasma
portal vein versus periphery
FXR and TGR5 receptors
author_facet Samuel A. J. Trammell
Jens S. Svenningsen
Jens J. Holst
Matthew P. Gillum
Rune E. Kuhre
author_sort Samuel A. J. Trammell
title Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
title_short Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
title_full Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
title_fullStr Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
title_full_unstemmed Hepatic Bile Acid Reuptake in the Rat Depends on Bile Acid Conjugation but Not on Agonistic Properties towards FXR and TGR5
title_sort hepatic bile acid reuptake in the rat depends on bile acid conjugation but not on agonistic properties towards fxr and tgr5
publisher MDPI AG
series Molecules
issn 1420-3049
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Takeda G-protein coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) are the two known bile acid (BA) sensitive receptors and are expressed in the intestine and liver as well as in extra-enterohepatic tissues. The physiological effects of extra-enterohepatic FXR/TRG5 remain unclear. Further, the extent BAs escape liver reabsorption and how they interact with extra-enterohepatic FXR/TGR5 is understudied. We investigated if hepatic BA reuptake differed between BAs agonistic for FXR and TGR5 compared to non-agonists in the rat. Blood was collected from the portal vein and inferior caval vein from anesthetized rats before and 5, 20, 30, and 40 min post stimulation with sulfated cholecystokinin-8. Plasma concentrations of 20 different BAs were assessed by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Total portal vein BA AUC was 3–4 times greater than in the vena cava inferior (2.7 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 mM x min, <i>p</i> < 0.01, n = 8) with total unconjugated BAs being 2–3-fold higher than total conjugated BAs (AUC 8–10 higher <i>p</i> < 0.05 for both). However, in both cases, absolute ratios varied greatly among different BAs. The average hepatic reuptake of BAs agonistic for FXR/TGR5 was similar to non-agonists. However, as the sum of non-agonist BAs in vena portae was 2–3-fold higher than the sum agonist (<i>p</i> < 0.05), the peripheral BA pool was composed mostly of non-agonist BAs. We conclude that hepatic BA reuptake varies substantially by type and does not favor FXR/TGR5 BAs agonists.
topic hepatic bile acid reuptake
bile acid spill over
bile acids in plasma
portal vein versus periphery
FXR and TGR5 receptors
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/10/2371
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelajtrammell hepaticbileacidreuptakeintheratdependsonbileacidconjugationbutnotonagonisticpropertiestowardsfxrandtgr5
AT jensssvenningsen hepaticbileacidreuptakeintheratdependsonbileacidconjugationbutnotonagonisticpropertiestowardsfxrandtgr5
AT jensjholst hepaticbileacidreuptakeintheratdependsonbileacidconjugationbutnotonagonisticpropertiestowardsfxrandtgr5
AT matthewpgillum hepaticbileacidreuptakeintheratdependsonbileacidconjugationbutnotonagonisticpropertiestowardsfxrandtgr5
AT runeekuhre hepaticbileacidreuptakeintheratdependsonbileacidconjugationbutnotonagonisticpropertiestowardsfxrandtgr5
_version_ 1724879998362320896