Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act
Child psychological maltreatment (CPM) was incorporated into the Quebec Youth Protection Act (YPA) in 2006. At that time, various civil-society actors were invited to present to Parliament their views on these legislative changes. The objective of this article is to document the social representatio...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Societies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/114 |
id |
doaj-616c6ab2112641a08f4ba8c465f07be9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-616c6ab2112641a08f4ba8c465f07be92021-09-26T01:26:00ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982021-09-011111411410.3390/soc11030114Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection ActNathalie Plante0Lilian Negura1School of Social Work, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaSchool of Social Work, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaChild psychological maltreatment (CPM) was incorporated into the Quebec Youth Protection Act (YPA) in 2006. At that time, various civil-society actors were invited to present to Parliament their views on these legislative changes. The objective of this article is to document the social representations mobilized by the stakeholders in the parliamentary committee in relation to the inclusion of CPM in the Quebec YPA. After explaining our research objectives, questions, and methodology, we will discuss our results, in particular about the distinctive nature of children as a representational object. This specificity will be analyzed in order to better understand the type of communication it generates and the corresponding hegemonic representation of parents. Specifically, implications related to the representational dynamics identified are discussed in relation to our collective capacity (or incapacity) to debate sensitive issues such as child abuse.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/114child psychological maltreatmentsocial representationssacralized social representationsparliamentary commissionyouth protectionYouth Protection Act |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nathalie Plante Lilian Negura |
spellingShingle |
Nathalie Plante Lilian Negura Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act Societies child psychological maltreatment social representations sacralized social representations parliamentary commission youth protection Youth Protection Act |
author_facet |
Nathalie Plante Lilian Negura |
author_sort |
Nathalie Plante |
title |
Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act |
title_short |
Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act |
title_full |
Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act |
title_fullStr |
Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Representations of Children and Parents in Parliamentary-Committee Debates about the Inclusion of Child Psychological Maltreatment in the Quebec Youth Protection Act |
title_sort |
social representations of children and parents in parliamentary-committee debates about the inclusion of child psychological maltreatment in the quebec youth protection act |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Societies |
issn |
2075-4698 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Child psychological maltreatment (CPM) was incorporated into the Quebec Youth Protection Act (YPA) in 2006. At that time, various civil-society actors were invited to present to Parliament their views on these legislative changes. The objective of this article is to document the social representations mobilized by the stakeholders in the parliamentary committee in relation to the inclusion of CPM in the Quebec YPA. After explaining our research objectives, questions, and methodology, we will discuss our results, in particular about the distinctive nature of children as a representational object. This specificity will be analyzed in order to better understand the type of communication it generates and the corresponding hegemonic representation of parents. Specifically, implications related to the representational dynamics identified are discussed in relation to our collective capacity (or incapacity) to debate sensitive issues such as child abuse. |
topic |
child psychological maltreatment social representations sacralized social representations parliamentary commission youth protection Youth Protection Act |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/114 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nathalieplante socialrepresentationsofchildrenandparentsinparliamentarycommitteedebatesabouttheinclusionofchildpsychologicalmaltreatmentinthequebecyouthprotectionact AT liliannegura socialrepresentationsofchildrenandparentsinparliamentarycommitteedebatesabouttheinclusionofchildpsychologicalmaltreatmentinthequebecyouthprotectionact |
_version_ |
1716868994939486208 |