The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms

This study examined teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of education reforms, focusing on a state legislated education bill that altered teacher evaluations. A mixed-method design, including an electronic survey, was used to gather perceptions of Colorado Senate Bill 10-191: Great Teachers and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Melvoin Bridich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2016-08-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2192
id doaj-614aaf1677744a00b0abb1b51c1b10d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-614aaf1677744a00b0abb1b51c1b10d42020-11-25T03:23:48ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412016-08-0124010.14507/epaa.24.21921532The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reformsSarah Melvoin Bridich0University of DenverThis study examined teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of education reforms, focusing on a state legislated education bill that altered teacher evaluations. A mixed-method design, including an electronic survey, was used to gather perceptions of Colorado Senate Bill 10-191: Great Teachers and Leaders Act from teachers and administrators in the Rockies School District (RSD), as well as these two groups’ general perceptions of teacher evaluations, education reforms, and change. Results revealed that teachers collectively hold similar views of education reforms, as do administrators; however, how each group perceives these elements of education policy and reform differs significantly. Both teachers and administrators believed that their groups see education reforms similarly, yet these groups had statistically significant differences on more than half of the survey questions. Qualitative data, in the form of open-ended responses to survey questions and semi-formal interviews, corroborated these findings. The two groups were unaware that their perceptions vary on critical issues related to the successful implementation of this education reform. This perception gap raises the questions of whether and how they can work together as reform implementation moves forward, and whether and how they can collectively support student learning as each group envisions, regardless of the policy itself.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2192education reformeducation policyteacher perceptionsteacher evaluationsteacher effectivenessteacher qualityadministrator perceptions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Melvoin Bridich
spellingShingle Sarah Melvoin Bridich
The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
Education Policy Analysis Archives
education reform
education policy
teacher perceptions
teacher evaluations
teacher effectiveness
teacher quality
administrator perceptions
author_facet Sarah Melvoin Bridich
author_sort Sarah Melvoin Bridich
title The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
title_short The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
title_full The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
title_fullStr The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
title_full_unstemmed The invisible schism: Teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
title_sort invisible schism: teachers’ and administrators’ differing perceptions of education reforms
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2016-08-01
description This study examined teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of education reforms, focusing on a state legislated education bill that altered teacher evaluations. A mixed-method design, including an electronic survey, was used to gather perceptions of Colorado Senate Bill 10-191: Great Teachers and Leaders Act from teachers and administrators in the Rockies School District (RSD), as well as these two groups’ general perceptions of teacher evaluations, education reforms, and change. Results revealed that teachers collectively hold similar views of education reforms, as do administrators; however, how each group perceives these elements of education policy and reform differs significantly. Both teachers and administrators believed that their groups see education reforms similarly, yet these groups had statistically significant differences on more than half of the survey questions. Qualitative data, in the form of open-ended responses to survey questions and semi-formal interviews, corroborated these findings. The two groups were unaware that their perceptions vary on critical issues related to the successful implementation of this education reform. This perception gap raises the questions of whether and how they can work together as reform implementation moves forward, and whether and how they can collectively support student learning as each group envisions, regardless of the policy itself.
topic education reform
education policy
teacher perceptions
teacher evaluations
teacher effectiveness
teacher quality
administrator perceptions
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2192
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmelvoinbridich theinvisibleschismteachersandadministratorsdifferingperceptionsofeducationreforms
AT sarahmelvoinbridich invisibleschismteachersandadministratorsdifferingperceptionsofeducationreforms
_version_ 1724604574495408128