Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan

A fundamental problem in governing natural resources is how to design institutions, particularly property rights regimes, that support sustainable use and management of common property resources. Privatization of natural resources was a widespread solution to the “tragedy of the commons” during the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu Yu, Ulan Kasymov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2020-02-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/940
id doaj-61448495ca6b48799effeb1c8dbd5f07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61448495ca6b48799effeb1c8dbd5f072020-11-25T03:49:38ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812020-02-0114110.5334/ijc.940450Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and KyrgyzstanLu Yu0Ulan Kasymov1School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, CN; German Development Institute-Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn; The Berlin Workshop in Institutional Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems (WINS), Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinResource Economics Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Ecosystem Services, Technische Universität DresdenA fundamental problem in governing natural resources is how to design institutions, particularly property rights regimes, that support sustainable use and management of common property resources. Privatization of natural resources was a widespread solution to the “tragedy of the commons” during the 1980s and 1990s. But many such efforts failed to achieve sustainable use of resources, and policymakers are now experimenting with new types of policy interventions. We examine recent changes in pastoral institutions and their outcomes regarding resource-use rights and the sustainability of resource use in China and Kyrgyzstan. Interpreting changing property rights as a process of social construction, we examine altered rules and rights relations and the ensuing changes in legal correlates between various actors in selected choice settings. The article contributes to the literature regarding the impacts of such reforms on property rights and their development in pastoral contexts.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/940institutional changeproperty rightsgrassland managementchinakyrgyzstan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lu Yu
Ulan Kasymov
spellingShingle Lu Yu
Ulan Kasymov
Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
International Journal of the Commons
institutional change
property rights
grassland management
china
kyrgyzstan
author_facet Lu Yu
Ulan Kasymov
author_sort Lu Yu
title Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
title_short Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
title_full Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
title_fullStr Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
title_full_unstemmed Social Construction of Pastureland: Changing Rules and Resource-Use Rights in China and Kyrgyzstan
title_sort social construction of pastureland: changing rules and resource-use rights in china and kyrgyzstan
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
series International Journal of the Commons
issn 1875-0281
publishDate 2020-02-01
description A fundamental problem in governing natural resources is how to design institutions, particularly property rights regimes, that support sustainable use and management of common property resources. Privatization of natural resources was a widespread solution to the “tragedy of the commons” during the 1980s and 1990s. But many such efforts failed to achieve sustainable use of resources, and policymakers are now experimenting with new types of policy interventions. We examine recent changes in pastoral institutions and their outcomes regarding resource-use rights and the sustainability of resource use in China and Kyrgyzstan. Interpreting changing property rights as a process of social construction, we examine altered rules and rights relations and the ensuing changes in legal correlates between various actors in selected choice settings. The article contributes to the literature regarding the impacts of such reforms on property rights and their development in pastoral contexts.
topic institutional change
property rights
grassland management
china
kyrgyzstan
url https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/940
work_keys_str_mv AT luyu socialconstructionofpasturelandchangingrulesandresourceuserightsinchinaandkyrgyzstan
AT ulankasymov socialconstructionofpasturelandchangingrulesandresourceuserightsinchinaandkyrgyzstan
_version_ 1724494267252998144