Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing e...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046 |
id |
doaj-6134c4653dd8481a88952f73210a352a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6134c4653dd8481a88952f73210a352a2020-11-24T21:26:25ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/876046876046Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer SurgeryFouad Aoun0Alexandre Peltier1Roland van Velthoven2Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumErectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fouad Aoun Alexandre Peltier Roland van Velthoven |
spellingShingle |
Fouad Aoun Alexandre Peltier Roland van Velthoven Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery The Scientific World Journal |
author_facet |
Fouad Aoun Alexandre Peltier Roland van Velthoven |
author_sort |
Fouad Aoun |
title |
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery |
title_short |
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery |
title_full |
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery |
title_fullStr |
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery |
title_sort |
penile rehabilitation after pelvic cancer surgery |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
The Scientific World Journal |
issn |
2356-6140 1537-744X |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fouadaoun penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery AT alexandrepeltier penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery AT rolandvanvelthoven penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery |
_version_ |
1725979979853856768 |