Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery

Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fouad Aoun, Alexandre Peltier, Roland van Velthoven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046
id doaj-6134c4653dd8481a88952f73210a352a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6134c4653dd8481a88952f73210a352a2020-11-24T21:26:25ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/876046876046Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer SurgeryFouad Aoun0Alexandre Peltier1Roland van Velthoven2Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, BelgiumErectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fouad Aoun
Alexandre Peltier
Roland van Velthoven
spellingShingle Fouad Aoun
Alexandre Peltier
Roland van Velthoven
Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Fouad Aoun
Alexandre Peltier
Roland van Velthoven
author_sort Fouad Aoun
title Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
title_short Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
title_full Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
title_fullStr Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Penile Rehabilitation after Pelvic Cancer Surgery
title_sort penile rehabilitation after pelvic cancer surgery
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/876046
work_keys_str_mv AT fouadaoun penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery
AT alexandrepeltier penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery
AT rolandvanvelthoven penilerehabilitationafterpelviccancersurgery
_version_ 1725979979853856768