Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption

Hearing rehabilitation tends to focus on the influence of intraindividual factors and concepts such as readiness for change and health beliefs. In contrast, less is known about the role of social context and the potential role of significant others on hearing aid adoption. This explorative retrospec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gurjit Singh, Stefan Launer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-10-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516673833
id doaj-61267568b0cd4685a17066d49cb74412
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61267568b0cd4685a17066d49cb744122020-11-25T02:58:17ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652016-10-012010.1177/233121651667383310.1177_2331216516673833Social Context and Hearing Aid AdoptionGurjit Singh0Stefan Launer1Phonak Canada, Mississauga, CanadaPhonak, Stäfa, SwitzerlandHearing rehabilitation tends to focus on the influence of intraindividual factors and concepts such as readiness for change and health beliefs. In contrast, less is known about the role of social context and the potential role of significant others on hearing aid adoption. This explorative retrospective study investigated whether hearing aid adoption is associated with significant other attendance at audiology appointments. The study sample consisted of 33,933 and 27,031 individuals who attended appointments either alone or with a significant other, respectively ( n  = 60,964). It was found that hearing aid adoption was significantly greater when patients attended audiology appointments with a significant other (63.8%) than when attending appointments alone (50.6%). The association between hearing aid adoption and attendance by a significant other was hearing dependent, with 96% higher hearing aid adoption for patients with mild hearing losses when patients attended appointments with a significant other than when attending appointments alone. Hearing aid return rates were comparable when patients attended appointments alone (27%) or with a significant other (24%). Several potential explanations for the observed association are discussed. The pattern of results is consistent with the view that greater adherence is observed when audiologic care is provided from a patient-centered care perspective. Future research should establish whether there is a causal relationship between attendance at appointments by significant others and hearing aid adoption and should attempt to better understand the mechanisms underpinning the relationship between these variables.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516673833
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gurjit Singh
Stefan Launer
spellingShingle Gurjit Singh
Stefan Launer
Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Gurjit Singh
Stefan Launer
author_sort Gurjit Singh
title Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
title_short Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
title_full Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
title_fullStr Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
title_full_unstemmed Social Context and Hearing Aid Adoption
title_sort social context and hearing aid adoption
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Hearing rehabilitation tends to focus on the influence of intraindividual factors and concepts such as readiness for change and health beliefs. In contrast, less is known about the role of social context and the potential role of significant others on hearing aid adoption. This explorative retrospective study investigated whether hearing aid adoption is associated with significant other attendance at audiology appointments. The study sample consisted of 33,933 and 27,031 individuals who attended appointments either alone or with a significant other, respectively ( n  = 60,964). It was found that hearing aid adoption was significantly greater when patients attended audiology appointments with a significant other (63.8%) than when attending appointments alone (50.6%). The association between hearing aid adoption and attendance by a significant other was hearing dependent, with 96% higher hearing aid adoption for patients with mild hearing losses when patients attended appointments with a significant other than when attending appointments alone. Hearing aid return rates were comparable when patients attended appointments alone (27%) or with a significant other (24%). Several potential explanations for the observed association are discussed. The pattern of results is consistent with the view that greater adherence is observed when audiologic care is provided from a patient-centered care perspective. Future research should establish whether there is a causal relationship between attendance at appointments by significant others and hearing aid adoption and should attempt to better understand the mechanisms underpinning the relationship between these variables.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516673833
work_keys_str_mv AT gurjitsingh socialcontextandhearingaidadoption
AT stefanlauner socialcontextandhearingaidadoption
_version_ 1724707275246927872