Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.

The field of paleontology, which is based principally on observations of the natural world, includes an active community that is engaged across multiple social media platforms, consisting of museums, academic researchers, amateur fossil collectors, paleontological artists, and commercial fossil deal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard T Bex, Lisa Lundgren, Kent J Crippen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219688
id doaj-6118b9cc604d4106a379aca060ffd4f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6118b9cc604d4106a379aca060ffd4f22021-03-03T20:33:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021968810.1371/journal.pone.0219688Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.Richard T BexLisa LundgrenKent J CrippenThe field of paleontology, which is based principally on observations of the natural world, includes an active community that is engaged across multiple social media platforms, consisting of museums, academic researchers, amateur fossil collectors, paleontological artists, and commercial fossil dealers. As such, it represents an ideal environment for examining the people, interactions, and flow of scientific information. Using interactions involving the four most popular Twitter hashtags for paleontology, this embedded mixed methods study defined the members of this social world and investigated how they influenced and controlled the flow of information, as well as how their expression of scientific practice was related to their identity. Results provide further evidence for the diversity of people and practice involved in this domain of science and indicate that the magnitude and breadth of the public's impact may be larger than previously projected. Certain types of messages were shown to be effective for different segments of the community, but news posts, essentially media outlet stories, were ineffective for generating any form of engagement. This study adds to our understanding of the important scientific contribution being made by members of the public as they interact with professional scientists and educators as peers in an open social media platform that supports a diverse and active community.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219688
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard T Bex
Lisa Lundgren
Kent J Crippen
spellingShingle Richard T Bex
Lisa Lundgren
Kent J Crippen
Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Richard T Bex
Lisa Lundgren
Kent J Crippen
author_sort Richard T Bex
title Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
title_short Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
title_full Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
title_fullStr Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
title_sort scientific twitter: the flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The field of paleontology, which is based principally on observations of the natural world, includes an active community that is engaged across multiple social media platforms, consisting of museums, academic researchers, amateur fossil collectors, paleontological artists, and commercial fossil dealers. As such, it represents an ideal environment for examining the people, interactions, and flow of scientific information. Using interactions involving the four most popular Twitter hashtags for paleontology, this embedded mixed methods study defined the members of this social world and investigated how they influenced and controlled the flow of information, as well as how their expression of scientific practice was related to their identity. Results provide further evidence for the diversity of people and practice involved in this domain of science and indicate that the magnitude and breadth of the public's impact may be larger than previously projected. Certain types of messages were shown to be effective for different segments of the community, but news posts, essentially media outlet stories, were ineffective for generating any form of engagement. This study adds to our understanding of the important scientific contribution being made by members of the public as they interact with professional scientists and educators as peers in an open social media platform that supports a diverse and active community.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219688
work_keys_str_mv AT richardtbex scientifictwittertheflowofpaleontologicalcommunicationacrossatopicnetwork
AT lisalundgren scientifictwittertheflowofpaleontologicalcommunicationacrossatopicnetwork
AT kentjcrippen scientifictwittertheflowofpaleontologicalcommunicationacrossatopicnetwork
_version_ 1714821886015176704