Addressing the Language Description Deficit
Well-described language features are key to successful teaching and learning, especially for achieving advanced levels of proficiency. Other measures, such as simply increasing the number of reading and listening passages in a language program alone are not enough to bring the student to a highe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ncolctl.org/files/Addressing-The-Language-Description-Deficit.pdf |
id |
doaj-60d1a579ddf44b48acd9d0243827747f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-60d1a579ddf44b48acd9d0243827747f2020-11-25T01:11:39ZengNational Council of Less Commonly Taught LanguagesJournal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages1930-90312010-01-0182157Addressing the Language Description DeficitM. Ali Bolgiin0Defense Language Institute Foreign Language CenterWell-described language features are key to successful teaching and learning, especially for achieving advanced levels of proficiency. Other measures, such as simply increasing the number of reading and listening passages in a language program alone are not enough to bring the student to a higher level in a given skill. In fact, even being present in the target culture does not suffice. Angelelli and Degueldre (2002) argue that at advanced levels, even spending time in a country where the language is spoken is not necessarily sufficient for learners: "They do not need just exposure; they need answers to questions and explanations that they can rarely get by simply being immersed in a language/ culture." Less commonly taught languages (LCTLs) lack descriptions that have such answers and explanations (cf. Fotos, 2002). It is argued in this paper that corpuslinguistic analyses help to provide actual usage-based, rather than intuition-based, descriptions and explanations of language features. Such approach is illustrated through English and Turkish examples.http://www.ncolctl.org/files/Addressing-The-Language-Description-Deficit.pdflinguistic corpuscorpus-based research and analysiscorpus linguisticslanguage teachinglanguage learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Ali Bolgiin |
spellingShingle |
M. Ali Bolgiin Addressing the Language Description Deficit Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages linguistic corpus corpus-based research and analysis corpus linguistics language teaching language learning |
author_facet |
M. Ali Bolgiin |
author_sort |
M. Ali Bolgiin |
title |
Addressing the Language Description Deficit |
title_short |
Addressing the Language Description Deficit |
title_full |
Addressing the Language Description Deficit |
title_fullStr |
Addressing the Language Description Deficit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Addressing the Language Description Deficit |
title_sort |
addressing the language description deficit |
publisher |
National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages |
series |
Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages |
issn |
1930-9031 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
Well-described language features are key to successful
teaching and learning, especially for achieving advanced levels of
proficiency. Other measures, such as simply increasing the
number of reading and listening passages in a language program
alone are not enough to bring the student to a higher level in a
given skill. In fact, even being present in the target culture does
not suffice. Angelelli and Degueldre (2002) argue that at advanced
levels, even spending time in a country where the language
is spoken is not necessarily sufficient for learners: "They
do not need just exposure; they need answers to questions and
explanations that they can rarely get by simply being immersed
in a language/ culture." Less commonly taught languages
(LCTLs) lack descriptions that have such answers and explanations
(cf. Fotos, 2002). It is argued in this paper that corpuslinguistic
analyses help to provide actual usage-based, rather than
intuition-based, descriptions and explanations of language features.
Such approach is illustrated through English and Turkish
examples. |
topic |
linguistic corpus corpus-based research and analysis corpus linguistics language teaching language learning |
url |
http://www.ncolctl.org/files/Addressing-The-Language-Description-Deficit.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT malibolgiin addressingthelanguagedescriptiondeficit |
_version_ |
1725170407161462784 |