A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis

One of the most popular stormwater practices in (sub-)urban North Carolina is bioretention. While bioretention has been researched intensively to determine the most efficient designs, few long-term studies have attempted to assess the performance of older bioretention. However, previous research and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey P. Johnson, William F. Hunt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1945
id doaj-60cf374aebb6485a99210d8d116ae617
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60cf374aebb6485a99210d8d116ae6172020-11-25T01:52:49ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117194510.3390/su11071945su11071945A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial AnalysisJeffrey P. Johnson0William F. Hunt1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695, USADepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695, USAOne of the most popular stormwater practices in (sub-)urban North Carolina is bioretention. While bioretention has been researched intensively to determine the most efficient designs, few long-term studies have attempted to assess the performance of older bioretention. However, previous research and design guidance for bioretention has predicted long-term water quality treatment. This study compared discharged concentrations and loads of nitrogen and phosphorus from a bioretention cell (1) post-construction and (2) following 17 years of treatment. A conventionally-drained bioretention cell with lateral underdrains in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, was first monitored post-construction for 10-months from 2002–2003 and, again following continuous use, for 14 months from 2017–2018. Estimated mass load reductions during the initial monitoring period were 40% for total nitrogen (TN) and 65% for total phosphorus (TP). Mass load reductions were increased 17 years after construction, with reductions of 72% and 79% for TN and TP, respectively. Plant growth, death, and decay over the 17-year life of the bioretention cell are hypothesized to have contributed additional nitrogen assimilation and carbon to the fill media, serving as a catalyst for nitrogen treatment. Phosphorus removal remained relatively unchanged between the two monitoring periods. Filter media samples indicated the top 20 cm of filter media were nearing phosphorus saturation, but with 1.2 m of filter media, lower depths would most likely continue to provide treatment. If designed, built, and maintained correctly, bioretention appears to provide sustained treatment of stormwater runoff for nitrogen and phosphorus for nearly two decades, and likely longer.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1945stormwater managementgreen infrastructurebioretentionbiofiltersustainable drainage systemswater qualitylow impact developmentnitrogenphosphorus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeffrey P. Johnson
William F. Hunt
spellingShingle Jeffrey P. Johnson
William F. Hunt
A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
Sustainability
stormwater management
green infrastructure
bioretention
biofilter
sustainable drainage systems
water quality
low impact development
nitrogen
phosphorus
author_facet Jeffrey P. Johnson
William F. Hunt
author_sort Jeffrey P. Johnson
title A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
title_short A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
title_full A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
title_fullStr A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Comparison of Water Quality Treatment in a Bioretention Cell 16 Years Following Initial Analysis
title_sort retrospective comparison of water quality treatment in a bioretention cell 16 years following initial analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description One of the most popular stormwater practices in (sub-)urban North Carolina is bioretention. While bioretention has been researched intensively to determine the most efficient designs, few long-term studies have attempted to assess the performance of older bioretention. However, previous research and design guidance for bioretention has predicted long-term water quality treatment. This study compared discharged concentrations and loads of nitrogen and phosphorus from a bioretention cell (1) post-construction and (2) following 17 years of treatment. A conventionally-drained bioretention cell with lateral underdrains in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, was first monitored post-construction for 10-months from 2002–2003 and, again following continuous use, for 14 months from 2017–2018. Estimated mass load reductions during the initial monitoring period were 40% for total nitrogen (TN) and 65% for total phosphorus (TP). Mass load reductions were increased 17 years after construction, with reductions of 72% and 79% for TN and TP, respectively. Plant growth, death, and decay over the 17-year life of the bioretention cell are hypothesized to have contributed additional nitrogen assimilation and carbon to the fill media, serving as a catalyst for nitrogen treatment. Phosphorus removal remained relatively unchanged between the two monitoring periods. Filter media samples indicated the top 20 cm of filter media were nearing phosphorus saturation, but with 1.2 m of filter media, lower depths would most likely continue to provide treatment. If designed, built, and maintained correctly, bioretention appears to provide sustained treatment of stormwater runoff for nitrogen and phosphorus for nearly two decades, and likely longer.
topic stormwater management
green infrastructure
bioretention
biofilter
sustainable drainage systems
water quality
low impact development
nitrogen
phosphorus
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1945
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreypjohnson aretrospectivecomparisonofwaterqualitytreatmentinabioretentioncell16yearsfollowinginitialanalysis
AT williamfhunt aretrospectivecomparisonofwaterqualitytreatmentinabioretentioncell16yearsfollowinginitialanalysis
AT jeffreypjohnson retrospectivecomparisonofwaterqualitytreatmentinabioretentioncell16yearsfollowinginitialanalysis
AT williamfhunt retrospectivecomparisonofwaterqualitytreatmentinabioretentioncell16yearsfollowinginitialanalysis
_version_ 1724992862271045632