Het Lumumba-onderzoek

The Lumumba inquiry In his reply, E. Gerard, one of the experts of the parliamentary inquiry committee, comments on four aspects dealt with in the reviews of the Lumumba affair. One should distinguish between the judgment of the committee and the experts’ report as to their respective nature. The e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. Gerard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2007-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5021
id doaj-60c62ba83e964851afffcef020840ddf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60c62ba83e964851afffcef020840ddf2021-10-02T18:13:42ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982007-01-011223Het Lumumba-onderzoekE. Gerard The Lumumba inquiry In his reply, E. Gerard, one of the experts of the parliamentary inquiry committee, comments on four aspects dealt with in the reviews of the Lumumba affair. One should distinguish between the judgment of the committee and the experts’ report as to their respective nature. The experts want their conclusions, which are the result of historical research, to be part of an ongoing scientific debate. When carrying out their research they focussed on the professional standards of their metier, not the considerations of the raison d’état. By conducting a careful and thorough analysis of written and oral sources, they tried to bridge the gap between fact and fiction to lay a solid foundation for assessing the events around this controversial case. They put forward the concept of “moral responsibility’ to make it clear that the Belgian government, although not actually an accomplice in a murder plot, cannot be exempted from any responsibility in the developments that led to the assassination of Patrice Lumumba. In this way, they try to escape the deadlock created by a structural approach towards history. https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5021DecolonisationHistoriography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Gerard
spellingShingle E. Gerard
Het Lumumba-onderzoek
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Decolonisation
Historiography
author_facet E. Gerard
author_sort E. Gerard
title Het Lumumba-onderzoek
title_short Het Lumumba-onderzoek
title_full Het Lumumba-onderzoek
title_fullStr Het Lumumba-onderzoek
title_full_unstemmed Het Lumumba-onderzoek
title_sort het lumumba-onderzoek
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2007-01-01
description The Lumumba inquiry In his reply, E. Gerard, one of the experts of the parliamentary inquiry committee, comments on four aspects dealt with in the reviews of the Lumumba affair. One should distinguish between the judgment of the committee and the experts’ report as to their respective nature. The experts want their conclusions, which are the result of historical research, to be part of an ongoing scientific debate. When carrying out their research they focussed on the professional standards of their metier, not the considerations of the raison d’état. By conducting a careful and thorough analysis of written and oral sources, they tried to bridge the gap between fact and fiction to lay a solid foundation for assessing the events around this controversial case. They put forward the concept of “moral responsibility’ to make it clear that the Belgian government, although not actually an accomplice in a murder plot, cannot be exempted from any responsibility in the developments that led to the assassination of Patrice Lumumba. In this way, they try to escape the deadlock created by a structural approach towards history.
topic Decolonisation
Historiography
url https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5021
work_keys_str_mv AT egerard hetlumumbaonderzoek
_version_ 1716849627645345792