Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
2012-04-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003 |
id |
doaj-60c2755b94ed425f8888672ffd1306d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-60c2755b94ed425f8888672ffd1306d82020-11-24T22:51:36ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1516-35981806-92902012-04-0141483584510.1590/S1516-35982012000400003Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensilingLaura Maria Oliveira BorgattiJosé Pavan NetoAndré Luiz Veiga ConradoCarolina Tobias MarinoPaula Marques MeyerPaulo Henrique Mazza RodriguesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003alkalisfermentationsilage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti José Pavan Neto André Luiz Veiga Conrado Carolina Tobias Marino Paula Marques Meyer Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues |
spellingShingle |
Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti José Pavan Neto André Luiz Veiga Conrado Carolina Tobias Marino Paula Marques Meyer Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia alkalis fermentation silage |
author_facet |
Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti José Pavan Neto André Luiz Veiga Conrado Carolina Tobias Marino Paula Marques Meyer Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues |
author_sort |
Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti |
title |
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
title_short |
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
title_full |
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
title_sort |
evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
issn |
1516-3598 1806-9290 |
publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively. |
topic |
alkalis fermentation silage |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lauramariaoliveiraborgatti evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling AT josepavanneto evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling AT andreluizveigaconrado evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling AT carolinatobiasmarino evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling AT paulamarquesmeyer evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling AT paulohenriquemazzarodrigues evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling |
_version_ |
1725669033524592640 |