Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti, José Pavan Neto, André Luiz Veiga Conrado, Carolina Tobias Marino, Paula Marques Meyer, Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 2012-04-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003
id doaj-60c2755b94ed425f8888672ffd1306d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60c2755b94ed425f8888672ffd1306d82020-11-24T22:51:36ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1516-35981806-92902012-04-0141483584510.1590/S1516-35982012000400003Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensilingLaura Maria Oliveira BorgattiJosé Pavan NetoAndré Luiz Veiga ConradoCarolina Tobias MarinoPaula Marques MeyerPaulo Henrique Mazza RodriguesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003alkalisfermentationsilage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti
José Pavan Neto
André Luiz Veiga Conrado
Carolina Tobias Marino
Paula Marques Meyer
Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
spellingShingle Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti
José Pavan Neto
André Luiz Veiga Conrado
Carolina Tobias Marino
Paula Marques Meyer
Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
alkalis
fermentation
silage
author_facet Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti
José Pavan Neto
André Luiz Veiga Conrado
Carolina Tobias Marino
Paula Marques Meyer
Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
author_sort Laura Maria Oliveira Borgatti
title Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_short Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_full Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_fullStr Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
title_sort evaluation of relative biological efficiency of additives in sugarcane ensiling
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
series Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
issn 1516-3598
1806-9290
publishDate 2012-04-01
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding alkalis on the fermentative pattern, aerobic stability and nutritive value of the sugarcane silage. A completely randomized design with 6 additives in two concentrations (1 or 2%), plus a control group, totalizing 13 treatments [(6×2)+1] with four replications, was used. The additives were sodium hydroxide (NaOH), limestone (CaCO3), urea (CO(NH2)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), quicklime (CaO) and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The material was ensiled in 52 laboratory silos using plastic buckets with 12 L of capacity. Silos were opened 60 days after ensiling, when organic acids concentration, aerobic stability and chemical composition were determined. The Relative Biological Efficiency (RBE) was calculated by the slope ratio method, using the data obtained from ratio between desirable and undesirable silage products, according to the equation: D/U ratio = [lactic/(ethanol + acetic + butyric)]. All additives affected dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber contents and buffering capacity. Except for urea and quicklime, all additives increased the in vitro dry matter digestibility. In general, these additives altered the fermentative pattern of sugarcane silage, inhibiting alcoholic fermentation and improving lactic acid production. The additive that showed the best RBE in relation to sodium hydroxide (100%) was limestone (89.4%). The RBE values of urea, sodium bicarbonate and hydrated lime were 49.2%, 47.7% and 34.3%, respectively.
topic alkalis
fermentation
silage
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012000400003
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramariaoliveiraborgatti evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT josepavanneto evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT andreluizveigaconrado evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT carolinatobiasmarino evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT paulamarquesmeyer evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
AT paulohenriquemazzarodrigues evaluationofrelativebiologicalefficiencyofadditivesinsugarcaneensiling
_version_ 1725669033524592640