Estimating the Counterfactual Impact of Conservation Programs on Land Cover Outcomes: The Role of Matching and Panel Regression Techniques.
Deforestation and conversion of native habitats continues to be the leading driver of biodiversity and ecosystem service loss. A number of conservation policies and programs are implemented--from protected areas to payments for ecosystem services (PES)--to deter these losses. Currently, empirical ev...
Main Authors: | Kelly W Jones, David J Lewis |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141380 |
Similar Items
-
Estimating the Counterfactual
by: Linda J. Blumberg PhD, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Counterfactual Histories of Moon Landing
by: Borowski Mateusz
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Regret, Relief, and Counterfactual Thinking: The Effect of Outcome Valence on Counterfactual Thinking
by: Fenderson, Carl R.
Published: (2014) -
Counterfactuals Without Causation, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation
by: Loewenstein, Yael Rebecca, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Monkeys are curious about counterfactual outcomes
by: Hayden, B.Y, et al.
Published: (2019)