Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts

LNG can be stored either in flat bottom storage tanks or pressurized storage tanks such as bullets or spheres. Safety levels of atmospheric storage tanks are classified by codes as "single containment", "double containment" and "full containment". For spherical and bull...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Rath, M. Krol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2013-05-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6797
id doaj-60c194a808da4608990232af9b685a1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60c194a808da4608990232af9b685a1d2021-02-22T21:01:55ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162013-05-013110.3303/CET1331018Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank ConceptsS. RathM. KrolLNG can be stored either in flat bottom storage tanks or pressurized storage tanks such as bullets or spheres. Safety levels of atmospheric storage tanks are classified by codes as "single containment", "double containment" and "full containment". For spherical and bullet tanks an analogical definition by codes is missing and containment philosophies for atmospheric storage cannot be applied to pressurized storage. Therefore a new definition is proposed to describe the safety levels of pressurized tank types and flat-bottom tank types consistently. It is supposed to use the definitions single, double and full integrity instead of single, double and full containment in order not to mix up definitions. The integrity level a storage tank has been assigned to gives a direct link to the consequences that would have to be taken into account in case the primary container fails totally. The advantage of these new containment definitions is having available a normalized basis for the comparison of different tanks fulfilling similar requirements on safety design. It is expected, that the integrity level of the LNG storage vessel has influence on the risk to external population. To evaluate this influence, the risk to external population caused by the different LNG storage alternatives has been calculated by means of a quantitative risk assessment. These calculations show, that in general the risk to external population is the higher the lower the integrity level of the LNG storage. Therefore it can be concluded that high integrity solutions should be chosen where exposure of third party population is high. This should be considered when selecting the tank type (i.e. integrity level) with regard to the distance to populated areas as well as the population density.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6797
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Rath
M. Krol
spellingShingle S. Rath
M. Krol
Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet S. Rath
M. Krol
author_sort S. Rath
title Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
title_short Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
title_full Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
title_fullStr Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Risk Assessment for Different LNG-Storage Tank Concepts
title_sort comparative risk assessment for different lng-storage tank concepts
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2013-05-01
description LNG can be stored either in flat bottom storage tanks or pressurized storage tanks such as bullets or spheres. Safety levels of atmospheric storage tanks are classified by codes as "single containment", "double containment" and "full containment". For spherical and bullet tanks an analogical definition by codes is missing and containment philosophies for atmospheric storage cannot be applied to pressurized storage. Therefore a new definition is proposed to describe the safety levels of pressurized tank types and flat-bottom tank types consistently. It is supposed to use the definitions single, double and full integrity instead of single, double and full containment in order not to mix up definitions. The integrity level a storage tank has been assigned to gives a direct link to the consequences that would have to be taken into account in case the primary container fails totally. The advantage of these new containment definitions is having available a normalized basis for the comparison of different tanks fulfilling similar requirements on safety design. It is expected, that the integrity level of the LNG storage vessel has influence on the risk to external population. To evaluate this influence, the risk to external population caused by the different LNG storage alternatives has been calculated by means of a quantitative risk assessment. These calculations show, that in general the risk to external population is the higher the lower the integrity level of the LNG storage. Therefore it can be concluded that high integrity solutions should be chosen where exposure of third party population is high. This should be considered when selecting the tank type (i.e. integrity level) with regard to the distance to populated areas as well as the population density.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6797
work_keys_str_mv AT srath comparativeriskassessmentfordifferentlngstoragetankconcepts
AT mkrol comparativeriskassessmentfordifferentlngstoragetankconcepts
_version_ 1724256263120879616