The importance of scleral rigidity in ocular tonometry

The importance of scleral rigidity in ocular tonometry

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Francois J
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 1960-01-01
Series:	Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:	http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=1960;volume=8;issue=1;spage=16;epage=24;aulast=Francois

Similar Items

Non-Invasive Ocular Rigidity Measurement: A Differential Tonometry Approach
by: Efstathios T. Detorakis, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Scleral rigidity in emmetropes
by: Singh Y, et al.
Published: (1970-01-01)

Consistency of Ocular Palpation Tonometry with Goldman Applanation Tonometry and Its Reproducibility by Separate Examiners
by: Mehmet Özveren, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
by: Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Effect of age on refraction, intra-ocular pressure, facility of aqueous outflow and scleral rigidity
by: Avasthi P, et al.
Published: (1979-01-01)

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry
by: Grus Franz-H, et al.
Published: (2004-03-01)

Estimation of the accuracy and informativeness of measuring intraocular pressure in patients with their contact lenses on by transpalpebral scleral tonometry
by: N. Yu. Kushnarevich, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
by: Martin Zimmermann, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Goktug Demirci, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Maddalena De Bernardo, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Ocular surface displacement with and without contact lenses during non-contact tonometry.
by: Ulfah Rimayanti, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01)

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Herr A, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01)

Correction: Ocular Surface Displacement with and without Contact Lenses during Non-Contact Tonometry
by: The Staff
Published: (2014-01-01)

Correction: Ocular Surface Displacement with and without Contact Lenses during Non-Contact Tonometry.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Correlations between different tonometries and ocular biometric parameters in patients with primary congenital glaucoma
by: Marcio Henrique Mendes, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma.
by: Masato Matsuura, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Jämförelse mellan rebound tonometri och non-contact tonometri
by: Bergdahl, Emilia
Published: (2013)

Scleral rigidity in glaucoma, before and during topical antiglaucoma drug therapy
by: Agrawal K, et al.
Published: (1991-01-01)

Reply to comment by De Bernardo and Rosa on “Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus”
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST
by: Sushma Tejwani, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Can dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude help to detect severe cardiovascular pathologies?
by: Bertelmann T, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children
by: Ramin Salouti, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Effects of external scleral ring ligation and external scleral pressure on ocular structure and intraocular pressure in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
by: Yan-Hua Jiang, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Erratum: A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST
Published: (2017-01-01)

Differential tonometry in myopia
by: Reddy H, et al.
Published: (1983-01-01)

Mathematical modelling of tonometry
by: Gonzalez Castro, Gabriela, et al.
Published: (2011)

Comparison of Icare Pro Tonometry and Icare One Tonometry Measurements in Healthy Eyes
by: Hüseyin Mayalı, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy
by: Efstathios T. Detorakis, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry
by: Isabel Cacho, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Icare Rebound Tonometry in Eyes of Varied Corneal Thickness
by: Isil Pasaoglu, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

An exploration of through-the-eyelid tonometry
by: Vandivier, Suzette D. (Suzette Denise), 1978-
Published: (2014)

Goldmann Tonometry and Corneal Biomechanics
by: Dario Messenio, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

The Dynamic Scleral Extracellular Matrix Alterations in Chronic Ocular Hypertension Model of Rats
by: Chen Qiu, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Scleral buckling-induced ocular parameter changes in patients of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
by: Chang-Yu Qiu, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas
by: George A. Kontadakis, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Two-position measurement of intraocular pressure by PT100 noncontact tonometry in comparison with Goldmann tonometry
by: Ogbuehi KC, et al.
Published: (2011-09-01)

Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
by: Bruno Leonardo Barranco Esporcatte, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

SAFETY OF THE SCLERAL CROSSLINKING WITH RIBOFLAVIN AND ULTRAVIOLET A (UVA) FOR OCULAR STRUCTURES IN EXPERIMENT
by: M. M. Bikbov, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)