In Utero Detection of Retinoblastoma with Fetal Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound: Initial Experience

• Main Authors: Lisa B. Paquette, David Miller, Hollie A. Jackson, Thomas Lee, Linda Randolph, A. Lynn Murphree, Ashok Panigrahy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2012-11-01
• Series: American Journal of Perinatology Reports
• Subjects: retinoblastoma; prenatal ultrasound; fetal MRI; extraocular abnormalities
• Online Access: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0032-1316465
• ISSN: 2157-6998; 2157-7005

Purpose - Our aim was to evaluate and compare the ability of prenatal ultrasound (US) and fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect retinoblastoma lesions in utero. Methods - Fetuses at risk for having bilateral retinoblastoma were enrolled in this prospective study. High-resolution US of the fetal eye was performed at 16 to 18 weeks' gestation, every 4 weeks until 32 weeks, then every 2 weeks until delivery. Fetal MRIs were performed every 8 weeks starting at 16 to 18 weeks of gestation. An exam under anesthesia (EUA) was performed postnatally, the gold standard of this study. Lesions were classified as being elevated or minimally elevated based upon their morphology. Results - Of six fetuses suspected or confirmed to be at risk for developing bilateral retinoblastoma, one had tumors on her first postnatal EUA exam. A total of two minimally elevated lesions were seen by the EUA but not detected prenatally by imaging. One elevated lesion (2 mm in height) identified by postnatal EUA was initially identified by prenatal US. Fetal MRI did not detect any lesions. Conclusion - Both prenatal US and fetal MRI are limited in the detection of minimally elevated retinoblastoma lesions. Prenatal US appears to be more sensitive than fetal MRI in the detection of elevated retinoblastoma lesions.