Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity
BACKGROUND Gender equity theory in relation to fertility argues that very low fertility is the result of incoherence in the levels of gender equity in individually-oriented social institutions and family-oriented social institutions. The salience of gender to the fertility transition is strong in th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
2013-05-01
|
Series: | Demographic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/34/ |
id |
doaj-60a371f4cfc34908a276e8e073a1cca8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-60a371f4cfc34908a276e8e073a1cca82020-11-24T23:13:01ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712013-05-012834Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equityPeter McDonaldBACKGROUND Gender equity theory in relation to fertility argues that very low fertility is the result of incoherence in the levels of gender equity in individually-oriented social institutions and family-oriented social institutions. The salience of gender to the fertility transition is strong in theory but not as strong in specification of testable hypotheses as has been pointed out in the literature. OBJECTIVE The paper aims to clarify the specification of gender equity theory through a discussion of the difference between equity and equality and to suggest methods that might be applied to test the theory. METHODS The theory is restated and further developed using literature from different disciplines. The method is described using a decomposition of fertility for women by human capital levels. RESULTS The clarification of the theory includes a reminder that the theory relates to differences in fertility between countries and not to differences in fertility between women in the same country. In comparisons between countries, higher gender equity leads to higher fertility. In comparisons of fertility across women in the same country, higher gender equity does not necessarily imply higher fertility. In relation to measurement, a specification is suggested that effectively compares women across countries controlling for their level of human capital. Simple graphics are used to indicate ways in which fertility between countries may vary. CONCLUSIONS The paper concludes that it is likely the gender equity theory can be tested more readily by examining the behaviour across countries of women with higher levels of human capital. http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/34/complementarianismfertilitygender equityparity of participation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter McDonald |
spellingShingle |
Peter McDonald Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity Demographic Research complementarianism fertility gender equity parity of participation |
author_facet |
Peter McDonald |
author_sort |
Peter McDonald |
title |
Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity |
title_short |
Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity |
title_full |
Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity |
title_fullStr |
Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity |
title_sort |
societal foundations for explaining fertility: gender equity |
publisher |
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research |
series |
Demographic Research |
issn |
1435-9871 |
publishDate |
2013-05-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND Gender equity theory in relation to fertility argues that very low fertility is the result of incoherence in the levels of gender equity in individually-oriented social institutions and family-oriented social institutions. The salience of gender to the fertility transition is strong in theory but not as strong in specification of testable hypotheses as has been pointed out in the literature. OBJECTIVE The paper aims to clarify the specification of gender equity theory through a discussion of the difference between equity and equality and to suggest methods that might be applied to test the theory. METHODS The theory is restated and further developed using literature from different disciplines. The method is described using a decomposition of fertility for women by human capital levels. RESULTS The clarification of the theory includes a reminder that the theory relates to differences in fertility between countries and not to differences in fertility between women in the same country. In comparisons between countries, higher gender equity leads to higher fertility. In comparisons of fertility across women in the same country, higher gender equity does not necessarily imply higher fertility. In relation to measurement, a specification is suggested that effectively compares women across countries controlling for their level of human capital. Simple graphics are used to indicate ways in which fertility between countries may vary. CONCLUSIONS The paper concludes that it is likely the gender equity theory can be tested more readily by examining the behaviour across countries of women with higher levels of human capital. |
topic |
complementarianism fertility gender equity parity of participation |
url |
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/34/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petermcdonald societalfoundationsforexplainingfertilitygenderequity |
_version_ |
1725599678409474048 |