Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope

Kumiko Kato, Koichi Matsunaga, Yuko Takashima, Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, JapanBackground: A congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a relatively common disease in infants. We evaluated the results of probing three patients with CNLDO,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kato K, Matsunaga K, Takashima Y, Kondo M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-05-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/probing-of-congenital-nasolacrimal-duct-obstruction-with-dacryoendosco-a16880
id doaj-6087716a5d1042ad9d4c75475295aa33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6087716a5d1042ad9d4c75475295aa332020-11-24T22:44:02ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832014-05-012014default97798016880Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscopeKato KMatsunaga KTakashima YKondo M Kumiko Kato, Koichi Matsunaga, Yuko Takashima, Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, JapanBackground: A congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a relatively common disease in infants. We evaluated the results of probing three patients with CNLDO, under direct view, with a dacryoendoscope.Methods: Three cases of CNLDO were examined and treated by probing with a dacryoendoscope, under intravenous anesthesia. The diameter of the dacryoendoscope probe was 0.7 mm, and we were able to observe the inner walls of the lacrimal duct and able to guide the probe through the duct.Results: In all cases, the site of obstruction was detected, and the probe was used to remove the obstruction. At 2 weeks after the removal of the obstruction, there was no epiphora or mucopurulent discharge in any of the cases. No complications were detected intra- and postoperatively.Conclusion: Although only three cases were studied, we believe that probing with a dacryoendoscope is a safe and effective method of treating a CNLDO. More cases need to be studied.Keywords: probing, epiphora, mucoprulent dischargehttp://www.dovepress.com/probing-of-congenital-nasolacrimal-duct-obstruction-with-dacryoendosco-a16880
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kato K
Matsunaga K
Takashima Y
Kondo M
spellingShingle Kato K
Matsunaga K
Takashima Y
Kondo M
Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Kato K
Matsunaga K
Takashima Y
Kondo M
author_sort Kato K
title Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
title_short Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
title_full Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
title_fullStr Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
title_full_unstemmed Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
title_sort probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Kumiko Kato, Koichi Matsunaga, Yuko Takashima, Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, JapanBackground: A congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a relatively common disease in infants. We evaluated the results of probing three patients with CNLDO, under direct view, with a dacryoendoscope.Methods: Three cases of CNLDO were examined and treated by probing with a dacryoendoscope, under intravenous anesthesia. The diameter of the dacryoendoscope probe was 0.7 mm, and we were able to observe the inner walls of the lacrimal duct and able to guide the probe through the duct.Results: In all cases, the site of obstruction was detected, and the probe was used to remove the obstruction. At 2 weeks after the removal of the obstruction, there was no epiphora or mucopurulent discharge in any of the cases. No complications were detected intra- and postoperatively.Conclusion: Although only three cases were studied, we believe that probing with a dacryoendoscope is a safe and effective method of treating a CNLDO. More cases need to be studied.Keywords: probing, epiphora, mucoprulent discharge
url http://www.dovepress.com/probing-of-congenital-nasolacrimal-duct-obstruction-with-dacryoendosco-a16880
work_keys_str_mv AT katok probingofcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructionwithdacryoendoscope
AT matsunagak probingofcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructionwithdacryoendoscope
AT takashimay probingofcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructionwithdacryoendoscope
AT kondom probingofcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructionwithdacryoendoscope
_version_ 1725693290329669632