Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach

Building Green Infrastructures (GIs) to reduce stormwater runoff has been recognized as an effective approach to mitigate the negative impact of urban sprawl. Due to the significant differences in urban land use, some Land Parcels (LPs) may have difficulty in building enough GIs to meet stormwater m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qing Xu, Zhonghua Jia, Shuangcheng Tang, Wan Luo, Chengxuan Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1091
id doaj-6087036260c04e5d88a0be101638208d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6087036260c04e5d88a0be101638208d2020-11-25T02:01:44ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-05-01115109110.3390/w11051091w11051091Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading ApproachQing Xu0Zhonghua Jia1Shuangcheng Tang2Wan Luo3Chengxuan Xu4College of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaBuilding Green Infrastructures (GIs) to reduce stormwater runoff has been recognized as an effective approach to mitigate the negative impact of urban sprawl. Due to the significant differences in urban land use, some Land Parcels (LPs) may have difficulty in building enough GIs to meet stormwater mitigation goals. In this paper, we proposed a Capacity Trading (CT) approach that allows some LPs to trade their extra runoff retention capacities with LPs that have building difficulties, so that they can jointly reach the overall mitigation goal together. The rationale behind CT is that, to avoid potential penalties, it may be more economical for some LPs to ‘buy’ credit rather than to ‘build’ GIs. A case study was used to demonstrate CT operations for two trading scales: (1) CT within neighboring LPs (i.e., CT-1), and (2) CT within 20 m-radius LPs (i.e., CT-2). A GI implementation baseline intensity was set up firstly by treating the whole study area as one entity to reach a specified stormwater runoff control target; individual LPs were then examined for their GI building capacities, which may be deficit or surplus against the target. Results showed that the number and area of deficit LPs were reduced significantly through either CT scales; the number of deficit LPs was reduced from 139 to 97 with CT-1 and 78 with CT-2, and the deficit area was reduced from 649 ha to 558 with CT-1 and 478 ha with CT-2, respectively. The proposed method assumes LPs as the basic planning unit and encourages some stakeholders to maximize their GI building potential to compensate for those with disadvantages. The economic incentives for conducting CT among different LPs in urban area can help achieve stormwater mitigation goals more economically and flexibly. Some coordination among LPs in GI implementation is necessary, which presents both opportunities and challenges for city management.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1091green infrastructureland parcelscapacity tradingtrading scales
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qing Xu
Zhonghua Jia
Shuangcheng Tang
Wan Luo
Chengxuan Xu
spellingShingle Qing Xu
Zhonghua Jia
Shuangcheng Tang
Wan Luo
Chengxuan Xu
Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
Water
green infrastructure
land parcels
capacity trading
trading scales
author_facet Qing Xu
Zhonghua Jia
Shuangcheng Tang
Wan Luo
Chengxuan Xu
author_sort Qing Xu
title Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
title_short Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
title_full Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
title_fullStr Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
title_full_unstemmed Achieving Urban Stormwater Mitigation Goals on Different Land Parcels with a Capacity Trading Approach
title_sort achieving urban stormwater mitigation goals on different land parcels with a capacity trading approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Building Green Infrastructures (GIs) to reduce stormwater runoff has been recognized as an effective approach to mitigate the negative impact of urban sprawl. Due to the significant differences in urban land use, some Land Parcels (LPs) may have difficulty in building enough GIs to meet stormwater mitigation goals. In this paper, we proposed a Capacity Trading (CT) approach that allows some LPs to trade their extra runoff retention capacities with LPs that have building difficulties, so that they can jointly reach the overall mitigation goal together. The rationale behind CT is that, to avoid potential penalties, it may be more economical for some LPs to ‘buy’ credit rather than to ‘build’ GIs. A case study was used to demonstrate CT operations for two trading scales: (1) CT within neighboring LPs (i.e., CT-1), and (2) CT within 20 m-radius LPs (i.e., CT-2). A GI implementation baseline intensity was set up firstly by treating the whole study area as one entity to reach a specified stormwater runoff control target; individual LPs were then examined for their GI building capacities, which may be deficit or surplus against the target. Results showed that the number and area of deficit LPs were reduced significantly through either CT scales; the number of deficit LPs was reduced from 139 to 97 with CT-1 and 78 with CT-2, and the deficit area was reduced from 649 ha to 558 with CT-1 and 478 ha with CT-2, respectively. The proposed method assumes LPs as the basic planning unit and encourages some stakeholders to maximize their GI building potential to compensate for those with disadvantages. The economic incentives for conducting CT among different LPs in urban area can help achieve stormwater mitigation goals more economically and flexibly. Some coordination among LPs in GI implementation is necessary, which presents both opportunities and challenges for city management.
topic green infrastructure
land parcels
capacity trading
trading scales
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1091
work_keys_str_mv AT qingxu achievingurbanstormwatermitigationgoalsondifferentlandparcelswithacapacitytradingapproach
AT zhonghuajia achievingurbanstormwatermitigationgoalsondifferentlandparcelswithacapacitytradingapproach
AT shuangchengtang achievingurbanstormwatermitigationgoalsondifferentlandparcelswithacapacitytradingapproach
AT wanluo achievingurbanstormwatermitigationgoalsondifferentlandparcelswithacapacitytradingapproach
AT chengxuanxu achievingurbanstormwatermitigationgoalsondifferentlandparcelswithacapacitytradingapproach
_version_ 1724956153409961984