Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage

The storage and delivery of natural gas using adsorbent carbon monoliths at 3.4 MPa is only about 75% that of natural gas compressed to 21 MPa on an equal volume basis. One possible way to increase ambient temperature adsorbed natural gas (ANG) storage is to simply increase the storage pressure. How...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D.F. Quinn, S. Ragan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi - SAGE Publishing 2000-07-01
Series:Adsorption Science & Technology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617001493585
id doaj-606e13d0ace04917b2892f1e3ccfd6cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-606e13d0ace04917b2892f1e3ccfd6cd2021-04-02T12:34:27ZengHindawi - SAGE PublishingAdsorption Science & Technology0263-61742048-40382000-07-011810.1260/0263617001493585Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane StorageD.F. Quinn0S. Ragan1 Department of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7K 5L0 Waterlink Sutcliffe Carbons Ltd., Lockett Road, Ashton in Makerfield, Lancs. WN4 8DE, UKThe storage and delivery of natural gas using adsorbent carbon monoliths at 3.4 MPa is only about 75% that of natural gas compressed to 21 MPa on an equal volume basis. One possible way to increase ambient temperature adsorbed natural gas (ANG) storage is to simply increase the storage pressure. However, this will only be beneficial if there is unfilled micropore capacity within the carbon adsorbent. Carbons that have been optimized for storage at 3.4 MPa may not have sufficient micropore capacity to give increased storage at 6.9 MPa. In the present work, carbons have been prepared which are considered to be more useful for storage at 6.9 MPa than at 3.4 MPa due to their having an increased micropore volume fraction per monolith or storage volume. Although the pore wall separation of these carbons may not be ideal for maximum adsorbate density, these carbons showed that more than 180 v/v can be delivered from 6.9 MPa. This value approaches that of delivery from compressed natural gas (CNG) and exceeds it if the rectangular external envelope is considered as the realistic volume of the storage vessel. The results obtained clearly show the diminishing returns for methane adsorption storage with pressure increase. An increase of only about 30% in storage capacity was achieved from a doubling of the storage pressure from 3.4 MPa to 6.9 MPa.https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617001493585
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D.F. Quinn
S. Ragan
spellingShingle D.F. Quinn
S. Ragan
Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
Adsorption Science & Technology
author_facet D.F. Quinn
S. Ragan
author_sort D.F. Quinn
title Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
title_short Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
title_full Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
title_fullStr Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
title_full_unstemmed Carbons Suitable for Medium Pressure (6.9 MPa) Methane Storage
title_sort carbons suitable for medium pressure (6.9 mpa) methane storage
publisher Hindawi - SAGE Publishing
series Adsorption Science & Technology
issn 0263-6174
2048-4038
publishDate 2000-07-01
description The storage and delivery of natural gas using adsorbent carbon monoliths at 3.4 MPa is only about 75% that of natural gas compressed to 21 MPa on an equal volume basis. One possible way to increase ambient temperature adsorbed natural gas (ANG) storage is to simply increase the storage pressure. However, this will only be beneficial if there is unfilled micropore capacity within the carbon adsorbent. Carbons that have been optimized for storage at 3.4 MPa may not have sufficient micropore capacity to give increased storage at 6.9 MPa. In the present work, carbons have been prepared which are considered to be more useful for storage at 6.9 MPa than at 3.4 MPa due to their having an increased micropore volume fraction per monolith or storage volume. Although the pore wall separation of these carbons may not be ideal for maximum adsorbate density, these carbons showed that more than 180 v/v can be delivered from 6.9 MPa. This value approaches that of delivery from compressed natural gas (CNG) and exceeds it if the rectangular external envelope is considered as the realistic volume of the storage vessel. The results obtained clearly show the diminishing returns for methane adsorption storage with pressure increase. An increase of only about 30% in storage capacity was achieved from a doubling of the storage pressure from 3.4 MPa to 6.9 MPa.
url https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617001493585
work_keys_str_mv AT dfquinn carbonssuitableformediumpressure69mpamethanestorage
AT sragan carbonssuitableformediumpressure69mpamethanestorage
_version_ 1721568464295952384