26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate?
Student evaluation of courses and teaching at universities remains a highly contentious and divisive topic. Emotions and anecdotal evidence can overrule conclusions drawn from research on the validity and design of course evaluations. However, even amongst researchers, there is significant disagreem...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2011-06-01
|
| Series: | Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching |
| Online Access: | https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3220 |
| id |
doaj-6061dd1654a944fcb43036d599a28ccf |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-6061dd1654a944fcb43036d599a28ccf2020-11-25T02:04:01ZengUniversity of WindsorCollected Essays on Learning and Teaching2368-45262011-06-01210.22329/celt.v2i0.322026. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate?Pamela Gravestock0Emily Greenleaf1Andrew M. Boggs2University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoHigher Education Quality Council of OntarioStudent evaluation of courses and teaching at universities remains a highly contentious and divisive topic. Emotions and anecdotal evidence can overrule conclusions drawn from research on the validity and design of course evaluations. However, even amongst researchers, there is significant disagreement on the efficacy of course and teaching evaluations. This paper explores this ongoing dialogue through the medium of a parliamentary debate drawing from the breadth of current research on course evaluations.https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3220 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Pamela Gravestock Emily Greenleaf Andrew M. Boggs |
| spellingShingle |
Pamela Gravestock Emily Greenleaf Andrew M. Boggs 26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching |
| author_facet |
Pamela Gravestock Emily Greenleaf Andrew M. Boggs |
| author_sort |
Pamela Gravestock |
| title |
26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? |
| title_short |
26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? |
| title_full |
26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? |
| title_fullStr |
26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
26. The Validity of Student Course Evaluations: An Eternal Debate? |
| title_sort |
26. the validity of student course evaluations: an eternal debate? |
| publisher |
University of Windsor |
| series |
Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching |
| issn |
2368-4526 |
| publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
| description |
Student evaluation of courses and teaching at universities remains a highly contentious and divisive topic. Emotions and anecdotal evidence can overrule conclusions drawn from research on the validity and design of course evaluations. However, even amongst researchers, there is significant disagreement on the efficacy of course and teaching evaluations. This paper explores this ongoing dialogue through the medium of a parliamentary debate drawing from the breadth of current research on course evaluations. |
| url |
https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3220 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT pamelagravestock 26thevalidityofstudentcourseevaluationsaneternaldebate AT emilygreenleaf 26thevalidityofstudentcourseevaluationsaneternaldebate AT andrewmboggs 26thevalidityofstudentcourseevaluationsaneternaldebate |
| _version_ |
1724945149701652480 |