Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-foo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-605cf802360c459c8b9d60499e4f8e7a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-605cf802360c459c8b9d60499e4f8e7a2020-11-25T00:09:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01129e018341910.1371/journal.pone.0183419Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.Nienke S van DitzhuijzenMie KurataMieke van den HeuvelOana SoropRichard W B van DuinIlona Krabbendam-PetersJurgen LigthartKaren WitbergMagdalena MurawskaBrett BoumaMartin VilligerHector M Garcia-GarciaPatrick W SerruysFelix ZijlstraGijs van SoestDirk-Jan DunckerEvelyn RegarHeleen M M van BeusekomDM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-food' diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology.Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed.Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation.Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen Mie Kurata Mieke van den Heuvel Oana Sorop Richard W B van Duin Ilona Krabbendam-Peters Jurgen Ligthart Karen Witberg Magdalena Murawska Brett Bouma Martin Villiger Hector M Garcia-Garcia Patrick W Serruys Felix Zijlstra Gijs van Soest Dirk-Jan Duncker Evelyn Regar Heleen M M van Beusekom |
spellingShingle |
Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen Mie Kurata Mieke van den Heuvel Oana Sorop Richard W B van Duin Ilona Krabbendam-Peters Jurgen Ligthart Karen Witberg Magdalena Murawska Brett Bouma Martin Villiger Hector M Garcia-Garcia Patrick W Serruys Felix Zijlstra Gijs van Soest Dirk-Jan Duncker Evelyn Regar Heleen M M van Beusekom Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen Mie Kurata Mieke van den Heuvel Oana Sorop Richard W B van Duin Ilona Krabbendam-Peters Jurgen Ligthart Karen Witberg Magdalena Murawska Brett Bouma Martin Villiger Hector M Garcia-Garcia Patrick W Serruys Felix Zijlstra Gijs van Soest Dirk-Jan Duncker Evelyn Regar Heleen M M van Beusekom |
author_sort |
Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen |
title |
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
title_short |
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
title_full |
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
title_fullStr |
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
title_sort |
neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-food' diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology.Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed.Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation.Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nienkesvanditzhuijzen neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT miekurata neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT miekevandenheuvel neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT oanasorop neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT richardwbvanduin neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT ilonakrabbendampeters neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT jurgenligthart neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT karenwitberg neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT magdalenamurawska neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT brettbouma neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT martinvilliger neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT hectormgarciagarcia neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT patrickwserruys neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT felixzijlstra neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT gijsvansoest neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT dirkjanduncker neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT evelynregar neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine AT heleenmmvanbeusekom neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine |
_version_ |
1725413226219307008 |