Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.

DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-foo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen, Mie Kurata, Mieke van den Heuvel, Oana Sorop, Richard W B van Duin, Ilona Krabbendam-Peters, Jurgen Ligthart, Karen Witberg, Magdalena Murawska, Brett Bouma, Martin Villiger, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Patrick W Serruys, Felix Zijlstra, Gijs van Soest, Dirk-Jan Duncker, Evelyn Regar, Heleen M M van Beusekom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render
id doaj-605cf802360c459c8b9d60499e4f8e7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-605cf802360c459c8b9d60499e4f8e7a2020-11-25T00:09:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01129e018341910.1371/journal.pone.0183419Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.Nienke S van DitzhuijzenMie KurataMieke van den HeuvelOana SoropRichard W B van DuinIlona Krabbendam-PetersJurgen LigthartKaren WitbergMagdalena MurawskaBrett BoumaMartin VilligerHector M Garcia-GarciaPatrick W SerruysFelix ZijlstraGijs van SoestDirk-Jan DunckerEvelyn RegarHeleen M M van BeusekomDM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-food' diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology.Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed.Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation.Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen
Mie Kurata
Mieke van den Heuvel
Oana Sorop
Richard W B van Duin
Ilona Krabbendam-Peters
Jurgen Ligthart
Karen Witberg
Magdalena Murawska
Brett Bouma
Martin Villiger
Hector M Garcia-Garcia
Patrick W Serruys
Felix Zijlstra
Gijs van Soest
Dirk-Jan Duncker
Evelyn Regar
Heleen M M van Beusekom
spellingShingle Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen
Mie Kurata
Mieke van den Heuvel
Oana Sorop
Richard W B van Duin
Ilona Krabbendam-Peters
Jurgen Ligthart
Karen Witberg
Magdalena Murawska
Brett Bouma
Martin Villiger
Hector M Garcia-Garcia
Patrick W Serruys
Felix Zijlstra
Gijs van Soest
Dirk-Jan Duncker
Evelyn Regar
Heleen M M van Beusekom
Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen
Mie Kurata
Mieke van den Heuvel
Oana Sorop
Richard W B van Duin
Ilona Krabbendam-Peters
Jurgen Ligthart
Karen Witberg
Magdalena Murawska
Brett Bouma
Martin Villiger
Hector M Garcia-Garcia
Patrick W Serruys
Felix Zijlstra
Gijs van Soest
Dirk-Jan Duncker
Evelyn Regar
Heleen M M van Beusekom
author_sort Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen
title Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
title_short Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
title_full Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
title_fullStr Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
title_full_unstemmed Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
title_sort neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS.The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a 'fast-food' diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology.Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed.Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation.Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5595285?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT nienkesvanditzhuijzen neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT miekurata neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT miekevandenheuvel neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT oanasorop neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT richardwbvanduin neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT ilonakrabbendampeters neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT jurgenligthart neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT karenwitberg neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT magdalenamurawska neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT brettbouma neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT martinvilliger neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT hectormgarciagarcia neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT patrickwserruys neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT felixzijlstra neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT gijsvansoest neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT dirkjanduncker neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT evelynregar neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
AT heleenmmvanbeusekom neoatherosclerosisdevelopmentfollowingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationindiabeticandnondiabeticswine
_version_ 1725413226219307008