L’histoire économique au futur
This paper comments on Francesco Boldizzoni’s The Poverty of Clio in the context of the recent French-speaking literature in economic history and economic sociology. Boldizzoni’s argument about the concept of « culture », understood as a seemingly ultimate cause of economic phenomena, is discussed....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
ENS Éditions
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Tracés |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/traces/6592 |
id |
doaj-6058b8069e6e40ca870c438bca1db1b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6058b8069e6e40ca870c438bca1db1b12020-11-25T02:18:41ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122016-10-0115116410.4000/traces.6592L’histoire économique au futurClaire LemercierThis paper comments on Francesco Boldizzoni’s The Poverty of Clio in the context of the recent French-speaking literature in economic history and economic sociology. Boldizzoni’s argument about the concept of « culture », understood as a seemingly ultimate cause of economic phenomena, is discussed. Past rationalities, according to the literature, are difficult to analyse : the author insists on the permanent tension between different versions of economic rationality at each time period, as opposed to the conception of an evolution from the culturally embedded to the homo economicus. The author finally focuses on recent scholarship on the social construction of markets as one of the most promising bridges between economic history and economic sociology. For contemporary markets, the author argues, studies have substantially revised the idea that contemporary markets are impersonal and their equilibrium price-based.http://journals.openedition.org/traces/6592economic historyeconomic sociologymarketeconomic rationalitycumulativitylinguistic anthropology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claire Lemercier |
spellingShingle |
Claire Lemercier L’histoire économique au futur Tracés economic history economic sociology market economic rationality cumulativity linguistic anthropology |
author_facet |
Claire Lemercier |
author_sort |
Claire Lemercier |
title |
L’histoire économique au futur |
title_short |
L’histoire économique au futur |
title_full |
L’histoire économique au futur |
title_fullStr |
L’histoire économique au futur |
title_full_unstemmed |
L’histoire économique au futur |
title_sort |
l’histoire économique au futur |
publisher |
ENS Éditions |
series |
Tracés |
issn |
1763-0061 1963-1812 |
publishDate |
2016-10-01 |
description |
This paper comments on Francesco Boldizzoni’s The Poverty of Clio in the context of the recent French-speaking literature in economic history and economic sociology. Boldizzoni’s argument about the concept of « culture », understood as a seemingly ultimate cause of economic phenomena, is discussed. Past rationalities, according to the literature, are difficult to analyse : the author insists on the permanent tension between different versions of economic rationality at each time period, as opposed to the conception of an evolution from the culturally embedded to the homo economicus. The author finally focuses on recent scholarship on the social construction of markets as one of the most promising bridges between economic history and economic sociology. For contemporary markets, the author argues, studies have substantially revised the idea that contemporary markets are impersonal and their equilibrium price-based. |
topic |
economic history economic sociology market economic rationality cumulativity linguistic anthropology |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/traces/6592 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT clairelemercier lhistoireeconomiqueaufutur |
_version_ |
1724880548360355840 |