Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits
The divorce between profitability and growth that emerged since the 80s raises a paradox that has to be explained. The macroeconomic realisation of profits being determined by capitalists’ spendings, the slowdown of accumulation cannot come (theoretically) with a profitability recovery, others thing...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Recherche & Régulation
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Revue de la Régulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://regulation.revues.org/9294 |
id |
doaj-60540990e4d1491a806d126d06b078a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-60540990e4d1491a806d126d06b078a22021-07-02T21:46:38ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962011-06-019Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflitsThomas DalleryThe divorce between profitability and growth that emerged since the 80s raises a paradox that has to be explained. The macroeconomic realisation of profits being determined by capitalists’ spendings, the slowdown of accumulation cannot come (theoretically) with a profitability recovery, others things being equal.After having recalled, in a first chapter, that financialisation is only the last avatar of a long trend for capitalism to escape from real economy, we show, in a second chapter, that financialisation leads, for the individual firm, to a reorientation towards shareholders’ profitability claims at the expense of managers and capital accumulation, financial (indebtedness) and real (capacity utilisation) security, and also of workers (real wage).After having faced, in a third chapter, two methodological, embarrassing questions for kaleckian models of growth and distribution (not very plausible and unstable for the most plausible ones), we use, in a fourth chapter, a second macroeconomic approach (stock-flow consistent model) where conflict impacts distribution (conflict inflation) and accumulation (growth/profit trade-off). We show that dividends distribution and share buybacks allow, within the limits permitted by indebtedness, for a stimulation of rentiers’ consumption and for the realisation of profitability claims, in spite of the slowdown of accumulation.http://regulation.revues.org/9294financialisationcapital accumulationdistributionconflictsequilibriumfinanciarisationaccumulation du capitalrépartitionconflitséquilibre |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Dallery |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Dallery Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits Revue de la Régulation financialisation capital accumulation distribution conflicts equilibrium financiarisation accumulation du capital répartition conflits équilibre |
author_facet |
Thomas Dallery |
author_sort |
Thomas Dallery |
title |
Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
title_short |
Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
title_full |
Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
title_fullStr |
Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thomas Dallery, Le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. Changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
title_sort |
thomas dallery, le divorce rentabilité/croissance dans le capitalisme financiarisé. changements de régimes, équilibres, instabilités et conflits |
publisher |
Association Recherche & Régulation |
series |
Revue de la Régulation |
issn |
1957-7796 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
The divorce between profitability and growth that emerged since the 80s raises a paradox that has to be explained. The macroeconomic realisation of profits being determined by capitalists’ spendings, the slowdown of accumulation cannot come (theoretically) with a profitability recovery, others things being equal.After having recalled, in a first chapter, that financialisation is only the last avatar of a long trend for capitalism to escape from real economy, we show, in a second chapter, that financialisation leads, for the individual firm, to a reorientation towards shareholders’ profitability claims at the expense of managers and capital accumulation, financial (indebtedness) and real (capacity utilisation) security, and also of workers (real wage).After having faced, in a third chapter, two methodological, embarrassing questions for kaleckian models of growth and distribution (not very plausible and unstable for the most plausible ones), we use, in a fourth chapter, a second macroeconomic approach (stock-flow consistent model) where conflict impacts distribution (conflict inflation) and accumulation (growth/profit trade-off). We show that dividends distribution and share buybacks allow, within the limits permitted by indebtedness, for a stimulation of rentiers’ consumption and for the realisation of profitability claims, in spite of the slowdown of accumulation. |
topic |
financialisation capital accumulation distribution conflicts equilibrium financiarisation accumulation du capital répartition conflits équilibre |
url |
http://regulation.revues.org/9294 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomasdallery thomasdalleryledivorcerentabilitecroissancedanslecapitalismefinanciarisechangementsderegimesequilibresinstabilitesetconflits |
_version_ |
1721321618482921472 |