Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset

The human face is the most studied object category in visual neuroscience. In a quest for markers of face processing, event-related potential (ERP) studies have debated whether two peaks of activity –P1 and N170– are category-selective. Whilst most studies have used photographs of unaltered images o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin eDering, Clara D Martin, Sancho eMoro, Alan J Pegna, Guillaume eThierry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
P1
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00093/full
id doaj-6039e71287b54740829428dd55f731b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6039e71287b54740829428dd55f731b02020-11-25T02:52:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612011-09-01510.3389/fnhum.2011.000939894Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onsetBenjamin eDering0Clara D Martin1Sancho eMoro2Alan J Pegna3Guillaume eThierry4Bangor UniversityUniversitat Pompeu FabraUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversity of GenevaBangor UniversityThe human face is the most studied object category in visual neuroscience. In a quest for markers of face processing, event-related potential (ERP) studies have debated whether two peaks of activity –P1 and N170– are category-selective. Whilst most studies have used photographs of unaltered images of faces, others have used cropped faces in an attempt to reduce the influence of features surrounding the face-object sensu stricto. However, results from studies comparing cropped faces with unaltered objects from other categories are inconsistent with results from studies comparing whole faces and objects. Here, we recorded ERPs elicited by full-front views of faces and cars, either unaltered or cropped. We found that cropping artificially enhanced the N170 whereas it did not significantly modulate P1. In a second experiment, we compared faces and butterflies, either unaltered or cropped, matched for size and luminance across conditions, and within a narrow contrast bracket. Results of experiment 2 replicated the main findings of experiment 1. We then used face-car morphs in a third experiment to manipulate the perceived face-likeness of stimuli (100% face, 70% face and 30% car, 30% face and 70% car, or 100% car) and the N170 failed to differentiate between faces and cars. Critically, in all three experiments, P1 amplitude was modulated in a face-sensitive fashion independent of cropping or morphing. Therefore, P1 is a reliable event sensitive to face processing as early as 100 ms after picture onset.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00093/fullmorphingface processingEvent-related potentialsP1N170Category-selectivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin eDering
Clara D Martin
Sancho eMoro
Alan J Pegna
Guillaume eThierry
spellingShingle Benjamin eDering
Clara D Martin
Sancho eMoro
Alan J Pegna
Guillaume eThierry
Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
morphing
face processing
Event-related potentials
P1
N170
Category-selectivity
author_facet Benjamin eDering
Clara D Martin
Sancho eMoro
Alan J Pegna
Guillaume eThierry
author_sort Benjamin eDering
title Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
title_short Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
title_full Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
title_fullStr Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
title_full_unstemmed Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
title_sort face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2011-09-01
description The human face is the most studied object category in visual neuroscience. In a quest for markers of face processing, event-related potential (ERP) studies have debated whether two peaks of activity –P1 and N170– are category-selective. Whilst most studies have used photographs of unaltered images of faces, others have used cropped faces in an attempt to reduce the influence of features surrounding the face-object sensu stricto. However, results from studies comparing cropped faces with unaltered objects from other categories are inconsistent with results from studies comparing whole faces and objects. Here, we recorded ERPs elicited by full-front views of faces and cars, either unaltered or cropped. We found that cropping artificially enhanced the N170 whereas it did not significantly modulate P1. In a second experiment, we compared faces and butterflies, either unaltered or cropped, matched for size and luminance across conditions, and within a narrow contrast bracket. Results of experiment 2 replicated the main findings of experiment 1. We then used face-car morphs in a third experiment to manipulate the perceived face-likeness of stimuli (100% face, 70% face and 30% car, 30% face and 70% car, or 100% car) and the N170 failed to differentiate between faces and cars. Critically, in all three experiments, P1 amplitude was modulated in a face-sensitive fashion independent of cropping or morphing. Therefore, P1 is a reliable event sensitive to face processing as early as 100 ms after picture onset.
topic morphing
face processing
Event-related potentials
P1
N170
Category-selectivity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00093/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminedering facesensitiveprocessesonehundredmillisecondsafterpictureonset
AT claradmartin facesensitiveprocessesonehundredmillisecondsafterpictureonset
AT sanchoemoro facesensitiveprocessesonehundredmillisecondsafterpictureonset
AT alanjpegna facesensitiveprocessesonehundredmillisecondsafterpictureonset
AT guillaumeethierry facesensitiveprocessesonehundredmillisecondsafterpictureonset
_version_ 1724727597484474368