Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?

Abstract. Acute and chronic infections with bone involvement remain a challenge to manage. They pose a significant burden to the patient, the treating surgeon, and society. Multidisciplinary team involvement is mandatory for a successful outcome. Application of a gold standard approach is not possib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng), Theodoros H. Tosounidis, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-03-01
Series:OTA International
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000068
id doaj-6016bafa9abf4c1fb62e41868476bc0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6016bafa9abf4c1fb62e41868476bc0b2021-04-26T05:15:14ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672020-03-0131e06810.1097/OI9.0000000000000068202003000-00009Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng)Theodoros H. Tosounidis, MD, PhDAbstract. Acute and chronic infections with bone involvement remain a challenge to manage. They pose a significant burden to the patient, the treating surgeon, and society. Multidisciplinary team involvement is mandatory for a successful outcome. Application of a gold standard approach is not possible due to the high heterogeneous patient population and the variable degree of severity of soft tissue and bone involvement. The mainstay of treatment remains the conversion of a septic environment to an aseptic one with aggressive debridement of the affected soft tissues and bone. Reconstruction of the soft tissue defect can be achieved using modern microsurgical techniques, whereas the induced membrane and distraction osteogenesis (bone transport) are currently the 2 most commonly used treatment modalities for bone loss. The safest approach to deal successfully with this multifaceted clinical pathology is to always follow well-established principles of management and adapt treatment to the personalized needs of the patient.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000068
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng)
Theodoros H. Tosounidis, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng)
Theodoros H. Tosounidis, MD, PhD
Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
OTA International
author_facet Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng)
Theodoros H. Tosounidis, MD, PhD
author_sort Peter V. Giannoudis, BSC, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Eng)
title Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
title_short Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
title_full Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
title_fullStr Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
title_full_unstemmed Acute and chronic infection: Is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
title_sort acute and chronic infection: is there a gold standard for management of the wound and bone defect?
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series OTA International
issn 2574-2167
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Abstract. Acute and chronic infections with bone involvement remain a challenge to manage. They pose a significant burden to the patient, the treating surgeon, and society. Multidisciplinary team involvement is mandatory for a successful outcome. Application of a gold standard approach is not possible due to the high heterogeneous patient population and the variable degree of severity of soft tissue and bone involvement. The mainstay of treatment remains the conversion of a septic environment to an aseptic one with aggressive debridement of the affected soft tissues and bone. Reconstruction of the soft tissue defect can be achieved using modern microsurgical techniques, whereas the induced membrane and distraction osteogenesis (bone transport) are currently the 2 most commonly used treatment modalities for bone loss. The safest approach to deal successfully with this multifaceted clinical pathology is to always follow well-established principles of management and adapt treatment to the personalized needs of the patient.
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000068
work_keys_str_mv AT petervgiannoudisbscmdphdfacsfrcsglasgfrcseng acuteandchronicinfectionisthereagoldstandardformanagementofthewoundandbonedefect
AT theodoroshtosounidismdphd acuteandchronicinfectionisthereagoldstandardformanagementofthewoundandbonedefect
_version_ 1721508886759866368