Effect of different light curing methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to different root canal regions

• Main Authors: Ali Eskandarizadeh, Shahram Farzin Ebrahimi, Niloofar Shadman, Saeed Rahmani
• Format: Article
• Language: fas
• Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-07-01
• Series: Journal of Dental Medicine
• Subjects: Dual cure; Resin cement; Root canal
• Online Access: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-818&slc_lang=en&sid=1
• ISSN: 1024-641X; 2008-2444

Background and Aims: Slow polymerization rate in early stage of light curing process leads to higher monomers movement and entering in polymer network that cause higher mechanical properties.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of light activation methodes (immediate, 5 and 10 minutes delay) on the push-out bond strength of cemented fiber posts in different regions of root canal with two types of resin cements. Materials and Methods: In sixty extracted human single canal, the teeth were decoronated from cement enamel junction and after root canal therapy, FRC postec plus were cemented with two resin cements, Duolink and Variolink 2, in three curing methods; immediate, 5 and 10 minutes of delay. After storing in a dark place for 24 hours, they were cut into three sections: coronal, middle and apical. The push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. The failure modes were observed using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (P<0.05). Results: In Duolink, immediate light curing had significantly higher bond strength than that of two delayed methods (P>0.05). In immediate light curing method, regardless of root region, Duolink had higher push-out bond strength than that of Variolink 2 (P=0.02). In all subgroups, there were reductions in the bond strengths from coronal to apical. Mixed failure at the cement-fiber post interface was predominent in all groups. Conclusion: 5 and 10 minutes delay caused reduction in the push-out bond strength for Variolink 2 but did not have significant effect for Duolink resin cement.