Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases

Abstract Background Little is known regarding the comparative efficacy of various irradiation strategies used to treat intranasal carcinomas (INC) in cats. Objectives Investigate outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival for cats with INC. Animals Forty‐two cats with INC that underwen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroto Yoshikawa, Tracy L. Gieger, Corey F. Saba, Kirsha Fredrickson, Lyndsay Kubicek, Siobhan Haney, David Ruslander, Krista L. Kelsey, Margaret C. McEntee, Michael W. Nolan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16098
id doaj-600632cc75cf43dd900bff372db4f857
record_format Article
spelling doaj-600632cc75cf43dd900bff372db4f8572021-03-26T10:53:09ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762021-03-013521018103010.1111/jvim.16098Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 casesHiroto Yoshikawa0Tracy L. Gieger1Corey F. Saba2Kirsha Fredrickson3Lyndsay Kubicek4Siobhan Haney5David Ruslander6Krista L. Kelsey7Margaret C. McEntee8Michael W. Nolan9College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USACollege of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USACollege of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens Georgia USACollege of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens Georgia USAAngell Animal Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USAHope Veterinary Specialists Malvern Pennsylvania USAVeterinary Specialty Hospital of the Carolinas Cary North Carolina USACarolina Veterinary Specialists Matthews North Carolina USACornell University Hospital for Animals Ithaca New York USACollege of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USAAbstract Background Little is known regarding the comparative efficacy of various irradiation strategies used to treat intranasal carcinomas (INC) in cats. Objectives Investigate outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival for cats with INC. Animals Forty‐two cats with INC that underwent radiotherapy (RT). Methods Single‐arm retrospective study. Medical record review for cats with INC that underwent RT at 1 of 7 veterinary RT facilities. Irradiation protocols categorized as: definitive‐intent fractionated RT (FRT), definitive‐intent stereotactic RT (SRT), and palliative‐intent RT (PRT). Median overall survival time (OST) and disease progression‐free survival (PFS; documented by advanced transverse imaging, or recurrence of symptoms) were calculated. Associations between tumor stage, RT protocol/intent, and adjunctive treatment usage and outcome were calculated. Results Cats underwent SRT (N = 18), FRT (N = 8), and PRT (N = 16). In multivariate modeling, cats received definitive‐intent treatment (DRT; FRT/SRT) had significantly longer median PFS (504 days, [95% confidence interval (CI): 428–580 days] vs PRT 198 days [95% CI: 62–334 days]; p = 0.006) and median OST [721 days (95% CI: 527–915 days) vs 284 days (95% CI: 0–570 days); p = 0.001]). Cats that underwent second DRT course at time of recurrence lived significantly longer than cats that received 1 RT course (either DRT or PRT [median OST 824 days (95% CI: 237–1410 days) vs 434 days (95% CI: 277–591 days); p = .028]). Conclusion In cats with INC, DRT is associated with prolonged OST and PFS as compared to PRT. If tumor progression occurs, a second course of DRT should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16098head and neck cancernasal cancernasal tumorradiation therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hiroto Yoshikawa
Tracy L. Gieger
Corey F. Saba
Kirsha Fredrickson
Lyndsay Kubicek
Siobhan Haney
David Ruslander
Krista L. Kelsey
Margaret C. McEntee
Michael W. Nolan
spellingShingle Hiroto Yoshikawa
Tracy L. Gieger
Corey F. Saba
Kirsha Fredrickson
Lyndsay Kubicek
Siobhan Haney
David Ruslander
Krista L. Kelsey
Margaret C. McEntee
Michael W. Nolan
Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
head and neck cancer
nasal cancer
nasal tumor
radiation therapy
author_facet Hiroto Yoshikawa
Tracy L. Gieger
Corey F. Saba
Kirsha Fredrickson
Lyndsay Kubicek
Siobhan Haney
David Ruslander
Krista L. Kelsey
Margaret C. McEntee
Michael W. Nolan
author_sort Hiroto Yoshikawa
title Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
title_short Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
title_full Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
title_fullStr Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
title_sort retrospective evaluation of intranasal carcinomas in cats treated with external‐beam radiotherapy: 42 cases
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Little is known regarding the comparative efficacy of various irradiation strategies used to treat intranasal carcinomas (INC) in cats. Objectives Investigate outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival for cats with INC. Animals Forty‐two cats with INC that underwent radiotherapy (RT). Methods Single‐arm retrospective study. Medical record review for cats with INC that underwent RT at 1 of 7 veterinary RT facilities. Irradiation protocols categorized as: definitive‐intent fractionated RT (FRT), definitive‐intent stereotactic RT (SRT), and palliative‐intent RT (PRT). Median overall survival time (OST) and disease progression‐free survival (PFS; documented by advanced transverse imaging, or recurrence of symptoms) were calculated. Associations between tumor stage, RT protocol/intent, and adjunctive treatment usage and outcome were calculated. Results Cats underwent SRT (N = 18), FRT (N = 8), and PRT (N = 16). In multivariate modeling, cats received definitive‐intent treatment (DRT; FRT/SRT) had significantly longer median PFS (504 days, [95% confidence interval (CI): 428–580 days] vs PRT 198 days [95% CI: 62–334 days]; p = 0.006) and median OST [721 days (95% CI: 527–915 days) vs 284 days (95% CI: 0–570 days); p = 0.001]). Cats that underwent second DRT course at time of recurrence lived significantly longer than cats that received 1 RT course (either DRT or PRT [median OST 824 days (95% CI: 237–1410 days) vs 434 days (95% CI: 277–591 days); p = .028]). Conclusion In cats with INC, DRT is associated with prolonged OST and PFS as compared to PRT. If tumor progression occurs, a second course of DRT should be considered.
topic head and neck cancer
nasal cancer
nasal tumor
radiation therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16098
work_keys_str_mv AT hirotoyoshikawa retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT tracylgieger retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT coreyfsaba retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT kirshafredrickson retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT lyndsaykubicek retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT siobhanhaney retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT davidruslander retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT kristalkelsey retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT margaretcmcentee retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
AT michaelwnolan retrospectiveevaluationofintranasalcarcinomasincatstreatedwithexternalbeamradiotherapy42cases
_version_ 1724202134048604160